|
The year 2011 was year of transition for
the St. Paul APWU. We moved out of our offices on the river bluffs in St. Paul to Mendota.
With that move brought the ratification of a new contract by our members that saw many changes. In
fact, more changes were agreed to in this present Contract than all the previous contracts combined. Much
of this year has been struggling to figure out how the new language is implemented. Almost immediately,
because of the new language the National APWU filed four Step 4 grievances concerning the new contract. Two
of these Step 4 Grievances were presented in front of an Arbitrator in December 2011. Further, locally
because of the ratification of the new contract we entered into LMOU negotiations with the offices we represent.
Forty of the forty-one offices that we represent were able to agree and we will be sending out LMOU to all these members
in the near future. However, the St. Paul Installation saw many items go to Impasse. Right now, the parties
at the Area level are trying to reach agreement on the outstanding issues. If no agreement is reached Arbitration
will be schedule late January or early February to resolve the disputed issues.As we look forward to 2012, it will be a very busy year. Management has provided the Union
with their staffing proposals for all the stations and branches, in St. Paul. There is much to disagree
on in these packages. The Union is meeting with management to provide input and alternatives to management’s
proposals. Further, it is anticipated that management at the St. Paul Processing Plant in Eagan will roll
out some sort of NTFT assignments, just not sure how many and to what extent yet. We are hopeful that management will fill
the openings in Vehicle Maintenance and Custodians in the near future. On the political front there are presently 19 congressional bills that propose to fix the Postal Service.
I use the work fix sarcastically because Congress created the financial problems at the USPS. However,
with the financial crisis looming the USPS proposed closing all the Processing and Distribution Centers in the Northland district
except St. Paul and Minneapolis. Postal Management has agreed with the Senate to hold the decision concerning
these closures until May. If these closures go through we will see many changes to bids in the Processing
Plant. Last, 2012 is an election year, we need to develop a plan to support and elect Congress members
that support working people and our issues. I hope as the election approaches our members will get involved
in whatever way they are able to help this happen. Our jobs and future depend on it.We will continue to fight and struggle on behalf of the members of this local for better working
conditions and a better future.

Happy Thanksgiving and Merry Christmas, to
all the members.
I hope all find something to be thankful for this holiday
season. The first week of December, the USPS is scheduling public meetings concerning closing three offices
that we represent, Seeger Square, Mendota, and Riverview.
Please watch for the notices of the
meetings and encourage your friends and family to oppose these closings. Each office serves a need within
its community and needs to remain open.
On a similar vein, consolidations of Area Mail Processing Centers in Minnesota are continuing.
We were just informed this week that Duluth has been forwarded to the Area and National USPS for consideration and
they are having a public meeting in Duluth on November 10th. If it is decided to close the Duluth
Plant, it will affect many employees who currently work there. I know first hand how these closings impacts
families from when I was working with those employees that were being excessed when we moved to the new building.
This consolidation will take it toll. In order for this to happen the USPS will have
to change its delivery standards from overnight to 2-3 days. Personally, I think this is a bad idea all
around, even though it would mean opening up day jobs within the Eagan Plant to process this mail. Now that Local Negotiations have
ended and Impasse items have been sent to the next level, staffing has taken front and center. This month
we will have to deal with the re-bidding of all the MVS routes, staffing for all the Customer Service Offices we represent,
and lastly custodial staffing is a concern.
The new Contract requires management to create
desirable duty assignments from all available hours. It also provides the Union the opportunity to provide
input and provide alternatives. If the Union does not agree with the staffing, there is an alternative
dispute process to resolve the dispute between the parties. The problem we have on the clerk side, is that
management has not given us the opportunity to participate in this process.
Last week, for
the level 21 and above Associate Offices and the Customer Service in St. Paul management met with us and said you have to
ok this in an hour. This is not in compliance with the National Agreement and the St. Paul APWU disputed
each new job posting. We are not sure at this point if the jobs will be posted for bid or not. This first
process was to create NTFT assignments to take the place of the PTR positions that went away on August 27, 2011.
However, management indicated to us that by November 15th they will have all the new
1994’s staffing packages and will be looking to meet on these the week of Thanksgiving. They have
already indicated that they intend to reduce jobs in Customer Service.
n Clerk Craft side, Director Gutzke has
assembled a team of stewards to input data and analyze it to provide alternatives for the dispute process.
Also, management has proposed 21 NTFT assignments consisting of 32 hours a week. We have had preliminary
discussions on this concept while not specifically seeing what has been proposed. Management decided not
to post this bids in early November bid cycle.
MVS Director Cook and Trustee Henjum are working very hard on the re-bidding process for the
drivers. The latest staffing package sent to us is unacceptable and if management refuses to modify it
we will be in dispute with these positions also.
Lastly, the Senate has introduced its plan to save the USPS. Now, there is HR 2309, Senate
Bill P-21, and the Super Committee all with competing ideas on how to save the USPS. At this point, we
not sure what is going to happen but we need to stay involved as members and call, write, and visit our Congressman to save
our quality of life. All the versions in their present format make the employee of the USPS take a hit
for the financial crisis that Congress created. Please continue to stay involved and motivated to help
each other in this difficult time.

Local Negotiations -
Local Negotiations have been completed
in all 40 of our associate offices, including Amery which joined us after the last contract. So, Amery
will be getting their very first LMOU. All Associate Office LMOU's were opened because the newly negotiated
National Agreement has many changes that affect each LMOU. We were able to agree on language for the newly created Postal
Support Employee a non-career category of employee that we represent. They will be given a Wednesday prior
schedule just like PTF's that is subject to change according to service needs.
They will
given access to the Annual Leave procedures established in each office. PSEs were incorporated into the
pecking order for those LMOU that have overtime and holiday pecking orders.
Also,
all LMOU's that had leave procedures that stated "eight hours or more" for leave purposes were changed to “one
scheduled day” to accommodate the Non-Tradition Full Time assignments. Local
Negotiations for the St. Paul Installation will be proceeding to Impasse.
The Union would not
agree to Management proposals to do away with your guaranteed right to take leave within the quota. Management
want to be able to determine service needs for you to take leave. The Union found these
proposals simply unacceptable. Now, management is going to have to prove an undue burden
on this issue. The St. Paul APWU will vigorously defend this existing language that has served this Installation
so well.
Also, Management is taking to
impasse a proposal to lengthen the time it takes to put some into a duty assignment from 15 days to 28 days. The
Union disagreed with this proposal and asserted that in the day of the computer they should be able to put people in bids
quicker not slower. In addition, the Union argued that by keeping an needed duty assignment unfilled creates
a financial burden on management to utilized overtime to fill the unfilled assignment. The
St. Paul Local also took proposals to incorporate the newly established Postal Support Employee into the LMOU where appropriate.
Management stated that they were under no obligation to negotiate with the Union on new PSE language in the LMOU.
The Union disagreed and explained that the new language would provide clear direction in which to schedule PSEs for
weekly and daily schedules as well as overtime and holidays. The Union also believes that the proposal
follows an established history between the parties on the issue of non-career employee that we represent.
Remember the TEs the proposals that were presented followed the same language the parties agreed to LMOU's when
we had them. Until these issues are resolved the existing language of our LMOU are to be followed.
The Union will provide information as this issue progresses. Thanks for your patience and support
on this. There was just no way that the St. Paul APWU was willing to eliminate the guaranteed annual leave
provisions in the LMOU.

This summer has gone by extremely
fast. There have been many issues the St. Paul APWU has been dealing with this summer.
The biggest issue is with the new contract and understanding what the new language means. This
has been difficult in that the parties at National Level seem to have many disagreements over what the language meant that
they negotiated. This has resulted in numerous National level grievance filed over Management’s implementations
of the agreement. This has been the backdrop for local negotiations. While the union has had a couple of trainings with National Officers explaining what they believe the new language
means. Local Management is still trying to figure out their interpretation of the language.
This has resulted in interesting LMOU negotiations. By the time you read this we should be close
to finishing up the negotiations. As you all should be aware the USPS has a financial problem.
This financial issue results in decision and proposals by Management that negatively
impact our members. This financial issue was created by Congress in 2006 and can only be fixed with Congressional
approval. After the results of the debt negotiations, the USPS saw an opening and have chose to use this
financial situation to try and convince Congress to strip us of contractual rights that were recently negotiated.
This is such a blatant disregard to good faith negotiations. It will poison the negotiations with
the other unions. There have been some flash bulletins sent out over the summer asking for your involvement
in this issue. I want to publically thank all those that have responded and if you have not please do so.
Your present quality of life is at stake in these issues. For the first
time because of the ratified contract the APWU now represents non-career employees Postal Service Employee. PSE
are required to take the entrance exam and placed on a register for hiring. The are to be hired from this
register.
The only way a person can be hired as a career employee is
to go through the PSE process of hiring. These are the future career employees of the Postal Service.
While we object that PSE are hired for the Plant because we have people still excessed with retreat rights.
Management still went through and hired them. We are closely monitoring their usage and will aggressively
pursue remedies where this is the case. With this said, I would encourage you to welcome the PSE
to your work area. Most have already chosen to belong to the APWU which is great to see. Non-Traditional Full-Time Assignment are in the process of being developed. There has been a great
deal of disagreement with Management on this issue that has resulted in numerous grievances being filed. This
is just the tip of the iceberg. We expect NTFT assignments staffing models to be presented in all area
that we represent except Maintenance in the near future. We will continue to work hard to represent our
members issue in this area. There are so many other issues I could discuss.
In closing, I believe the biggest battle we face is the one on Capital Hill. Remember, Congress
gave us the right to bargain collectively they can take it away. This issue I can not deal with by myself,
I need each and every one of you to find a way to get involved in the issue. If this financial issue does
not get resolved the Postal Service as we know it will go bankrupt and our collective bargaining will not matter.

From the June Postmark:
On May 11, the membership ratified the contract.
Our local had more than 60% of the members return their ballot and 84% voted in favor of ratification. We finished
6th in the nation of Locals greater than 1000 for members returning ballots. As previously stated
this contract has more changes than all the previous contracts combined. On May 20th, the Officers
and Stewards attended training on these changes in Minneapolis. This training will hopefully arm the stewards with knowledge
to enforce the new agreement.
The first order of business with the new contract is the issue of the Associate Offices. The
agreement has a global settlement concerning the amount of bargaining unit work that postmasters are allowed to perform.
In the past, we have used what is historical and customary in these offices as the benchmark. This
is no longer the case; we have several grievance cases that were put on hold pending this outcome. The
Clerk Craft Director, Bruce Gutzke is in the process of making sure these cases will be settled according to the global settlement.
Further, we know that there are many offices that we represent that have a postmaster performing
bargaining unit work in excess of the hours defined in this agreement. At present we are developing a questionnaire
that will be needed to process the grievances that are sure to follow.
Presently
they are still working at the National Level between the parties for an agreement on exactly what this means.
It is hoped in the next couple days that the National APWU provides us with this information. We
will then ensure that the Agreement is complied with for our members. This Local is in the process requesting
data from each AO that we represent to help determine where compliance is not being done. This Local will stand firm in representing
our members for the Associate Offices. We will need the help of our members in these offices to bring the postmasters into
compliance of this agreement. If your postmaster is performing bargaining unit work we need you to contact
the Union Office to ensure that we are looking into this possible violation. Thanks in advance for your
help in this issue.
This being the last Postmark for the summer, we will be in full swing of Local Negotiations before the next
publication. Please contact us if you believe that something needs to be changed in your local.
We have received some suggestions already.
Also, in May after the membership meeting we held an open house for our members to see their new Union
Office. I would like to thank Billie Dunn and Sue Helser for their help in organizing it. It
was a success we saw many members and a few retirees show up for this open house. One other thank you goes
to Steve Letendre for his work in getting the office ready for the meeting and open house.
Last,
I would like to wish everyone a great summer. We will be working hard over the summer months to prepare
for Local Negotiations for the St. Paul Installation and the Associate Offices that need changes to their LMOU’s.
Todd Elkerton
President

Hello Members,
reprintedfrom
the February Postmark
Times have definitely been difficult, not only
with home mortgages, health care, unemployment, etc; but also with the Postal Service and our jobs. Who would have thought that employees would be excessed out of their home installation to unknown and not
always preferred installations. The St. Paul bid cluster has weathered through that storm, but
now it is in front of us again at 5 of our Associate Offices.
Notification of excessing out of the installation
was sent to employees at the Cottage Grove, Stillwater, Northfield, Forest Lake,
and Owatonna offices in August of 2010. The original impact to these offices in total were 12 employees. After numerous days and hours of negotiations,
the Union has successfully gotten that number down to 6.
(Zero was our goal, but management would not go there.) The employees
are now in the preferencing stage and the results will be out in mid-February. These
employees will preference, but movement to their new installation will not happen as there is a moratorium on excessing outside
of the installation right now, as long as the National APWU and the Postal Service continue bargaining. As of 1/28/2011, these negotiations are still in progress.
Things at the new Eagan plant continue to be a work in progress. Meetings with management are being held weekly.
Not only are union issues discussed, so are any issues that are brought forward to the Union
by our members. If you, as a member, have any concerns that you would like to
have brought forward at a Labor/Management meeting, please contact a steward or officer and your issues will be put on the
agenda.
I am pleased to announce that both the purchase
agreements for the new building and the sale of the old building have been signed, and we are waiting for closing dates for
both properties. When dates become available, notice will be put out to the members,
but hopefully everything will be complete in March and we will be able to hold our first General Membership Meeting in our
new building in April.
Local elections are
upon us again, and I urge all members to vote.
Dawn Ecker, President

Hello
Members,
Well,
we made it through another holiday season, but this one was quite different than most others.
It was our first Christmas in the new Eagan plant, plus we had more snowfall this December than
in recent years. I hope everyone had enjoyable holidays.
We
are now in the process once again of reviewing Function 4 staffing at all the stations and branches. Management’s intent is to downsize stations again by getting rid of some duty assignments. We will be doing everything we can do to avoid downsizing, but we need your help. We need to be contacted for ALL violations, whether it be management performing our work, carriers performing
our work, work not getting down, Sox compliance not being followed, carriers not being checked in, etc. it is imperative that all violations do not go unnoticed. Please
request a steward when any and all violations occur. Management believes that
this downsizing could lead to out of the installation excessing once again.
There
seem to be more and more issues concerning overtime. I have had numerous complaints
that the overtime is not fair, not equitable, etc. the overtime provisions of
the National Agreement and the Local’s overtime pecking order have not changed for many years. The overtime is done on a rotating basis among the OTDL, quarterly, by seniority. It is not always going to be fair and equitable. Management
calls the overtime, not the Union. The Union should be receiving daily overtime consulations, to make sure the proper pecking order is used,
and the proper employees are being drafted for overtime.
FMLA
The
APWU is encouraging employees to use the Department of Labor FMLA forms. Management
has refused to accept the APWU FMLA forms, and the National APWU is pursuing a dispute with the Postal Service on this issue.
Update
on the New Building
The
final pre-construction meeting has taken place and the APWU is tentatively looking at a March 15 closing date for the new
building. We also are in the final stages of the sale on the property at 654 E 6th Street with Metro State University. We are hoping for a March closing date as well for the sale of the property.
Mystery
Shopper
After years of APWU complaints, the Postal
Service has notified the
union that the Mystery Shopper Program will be altered beginning in January 2011. Retail Associates (RAs) will no longer be required
to follow a precise script when waiting on customers; instead they will be permitted to “customize their questions to
best address individual customer needs.”
The questions have been a source of frustration,
both to window clerks and the mailing public, in part because RAs were required to ask every customer mailing a package a
litany of questions — even customers they knew well and whose needs they understood.
APWU Clerk Craft Director Rob Strunk praised
the decision. “Finally, a manager with authority has realized that our Sales and Service Associates can determine on
their own an appropriate method for communicating with our customers.
“The Mystery Shopper program has
been misused, abused, and violated in so many ways,” he said. “We can go forward now demonstrating our professionalism.”
The Mystery Shopper program, which was
recently renamed the Retail Customer Experience Program, has been a source of contention between the union and management
since its inception. The program relies on management designees posing as customers and scoring retail clerks based on adherence
to the script.
According to management’s Dec. 27,
2010, letter, the Product Offerings and Product Explanation categories will no longer be scored, and scoring in other categories
will be revised.
Contract Negotiations
As of the writing of this article, the
National APWU has stated that they are frustrated with the Postal Service and contract negotiations. The National Agreement expired on November 20, 2010, but talks have continued. For further updates, please visit the National APWU website.

National Election
The results of the National Election have been posted and I would like to welcome Marty Mater, the new Clerk Craft
National Business Agent for our region. Marty is from Madison, WI and was the Local President there. Welcome
Marty!
Excessing Update
Minneapolis has received their impact statement on
excessing out of the installation as follows: 66 Level 6 Clerks, 41 Level 7 clerks, 1 Level 8 clerk, and 6 TTO drivers. Minneapolis has not
yet received the impact statement for their maintenance craft. What this means
for St. Paul is that any residual positions in the Motor Vehicle Craft or Maintenance Craft in St. Paul would be withheld
for the Minneapolis excessing.
CSBCS Removal
We have received notice that the remaining CSBCS machines in the associate officers will be removed by November 30,
2010. We have received the impact statements for these officers and will be meeting
with management on these officers very soon.
New Union Building
The Union has agreed to a purchase price for the new union office at the Waters
Drive Business Park
for $435.000.00. We in the due diligence stage, then construction should begin
soon.
Sale of the Old Building
The Union has agreed to sell the property at 654 E 6th St
to Metro State University for $575.000.00. The paperwork
is being prepared by our lawyer.

Greetings!
Well, the majority of the move to Eagan
is complete and so is the reposting of the facility. It has been chaotic, and
probably will be for quite sometime. The Union
has been working diligently to attempt to resolve issues as they come about. Some
of these processes are new, and will take time to work out all the bugs. If you
have questions or want to address issues, please contact a steward or officer.
Staffing is still going to be an ongoing issue,
for all crafts. The staffing package for Maintenance is improper, and a request
to the National for a staffing advocate has been sent out in order to help correct this issue.
we have been notified that 5 of our Associate Officers will be excessing outside of their installation, and more offices
will be looked at. Stations and Branches will be reviewing their staffing once
again, as they did last year. And believe it or not, staffing will be looked
at again at the Plant, very shortly. I believe that because of the financial
woes of the Postal Service the attempt to downsize employees will be become an everyday occurrence. So it is very important that if management or another craft is performing your work, you take a stand and
request to file a grievance. This goes for all crafts in all offices. We cannot protect staffing, if we do not protect the work that is ours.
As reported in our National Postal Worker magazine, it is important to boycott USPS Employee Surveys. The Postal Service is likely to use these results during contrct negotiations, to undercut the Union. Management’s goal is to reduce wages and benefits
in this upcoming contract. Locally, we have quarterly VOE drawings for members
who turn in the VOE surveys to the Union. We
need your continued support in boycotting employee surveys.
From the President
Dawn Ecker
Reprinted from the September 2010 Postmark.
Move to Eagan
As I write this, we are in the process of the
move to the new facility in Eagan. Things have been hectic and crazy in this process, and have not gone as smoothly as projected. If you have any questions or issues, please contact a steward or officer and we will attempt to have your
concerns addressed with management. The union office will hopefully be up and
running by the time this paper reaches you. Please bear with us in this process.
National Convention
The National Convention was held in Detroit from August 20-28th, 2010. As always, there was lively debate on many issues, as our current contract expires in November of 2010. one of the issues of concern is our current FEHB. The delegates to the convention
made it perfectly clear that they were not willing to make any deals with the current health care provided to USPS employees.
Out of the Installation
Excessing
The Union and Management continue to meet on the number of employees who are scheduled
to be excessed out of the installation on 9/25/10. as changes are made in the
number of employees, management has sent out recinsion letters to anyone who
no longer needs to be excessed out of the installation. We will continue to meet
on this issue.

APWU St. Paul, MN
Area Local
APWU
September 16, 2010
www.StPaulAPWU.org
651-778-1637_
DUE TO
EXECUTIVE BOARD ACTION
DAWN ECKER
HAS BEEN ELECTED
PRESIDENT
AND WILL ASSUME THE POSITION OF PRESIDENT
EFFECTIVE
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2010
Jesse Lopez
Secretary
St. Paul,
MN Area Local
American
Postal Workers Union
The Special Election to
fill the office of President took place on June 23, 2010. The Executive Board
is required per the Local Constitution to obtain a 2/3 majority vote of those Executive Board Members present.
The Executive Board was unable to reach
a 2/3 majority vote.
After consultation with the National
Secretary/Treasurer’s office, it was determined that a 2/3 majority could not be reached and that Article 8, Section
2 of the Local Constitution would apply. This Article states in part: “In
the absence of the President, the Vice President shall be vested with the same powers as the President and shall perform all
of the duties of the President including attendance at all State and National Conventions.”
Dawn Ecker
Acting President

Hello Everyone (reprinted from the April Postmark)
The information in this article was excerpted from the National’s Booklet “When Excessing Occurs, Know
Your Rights and Benefits” to assist APWU members during a potentially difficult career experience. Excessing is rarely easy. A change in job assignment and/or
relocation to a new community can be a terrible experience for the worker and the worker’s family. But being excessed is certainly preferable to being laid off or terminated.
“When Excessing Occurs Know Your Rights and Benefits”
GUARANTEED RIGHTS
Within the contractual protections of the National Agreement,
postal employees enjoy specific guaranteed rights when excessing occurs. Five of these important rights are explained in this
booklet. They are:
1. Rate Protection
2. Protected Rate
3. Discontinued Service Retirement Benefits and Rights
4. Severance Pay
5. Relocation Allowances
RATE PROTECTION
Article 4 of the National Agreement specifies that
an employee whose job is eliminated as the result of technological or mechanization changes shall receive rate protection.
The employee continues to receive the salary they received in the previous higher grade position until such time as they fail
to bid or apply for a position in their former wage level. The salary protection provided by these provisions begins effective
the date the affected employee is assigned to a residual lower level position or becomes the successful bidder to a lower
level position. Any period as an unassigned employee following the elimination of a position due to technological/mechanization
changes should be paid at the former level. This protected salary is augmented by any general salary increases occurring while
the saved rate is in effect, including COLA and step increases. When it is intended to reduce the number of employees because
of the deployment of automated equipment, local management must initiate an “automation impact statement” identifying
the “impacted positions” and the number of positions to be reduced. Automation deployment may be in the affected
office or in another office; it may result in the movement of mail or the processing of mail. Under both circumstances an
“impact statement” is required. Employees receiving rate protection must bid or apply for all vacancies in their
former wage level. Failure to bid or apply will result in forfeiture of the former wage level. This requirement to bid or
apply includes only those posted vacancies for which the employee is eligible to bid or apply. While receiving rate protection,
employees may bid for vacancies at a level other than their former level without jeopardizing their rate protection.
Protected Rate
The Employee and Labor Relations Manual (421.51) specifies that employees whose jobs are eliminated
for reasons other than technological or mechanization changes and who are assigned to vacancies in a lower level shall receive
a “protected rate.” Such employee will continue to receive the salary of the previous higher level position, augmented
by any general wage increase, for a period of two years, provided that:
a. The employee served for two consecutive years immediately
preceding the effective date of reduction in a position with a salary standing higher than that to which reduced.
b. The reduction is involuntary. Employee bids occurring after
reassignment do not invalidate the protection.
c. The employee occupied a permanent higher level position and
their performance was satisfactory during the previous two years. Clerk Craft employees assigned to lower level receive “rate
protection” under all circumstances and continue to receive the salary of their former level, provided they fulfill
the requirement to bid and apply for vacancies in their former level.
RATE DETERMINATION
The basic salary of an employee entitled to a protected rate
will be the lowest of the following:
a. The employee’s basic salary at the time of reduction.
b. An amount which is 25 percent more than the maximum basic
salary for the new grade to which reduced.
c. The basic salary in the lowest salary standing which the employee
held during the two years immediately preceding reduction in salary standing, augmented by each step increase the employee
would have earned in the previous level.
DISCONTINUED SERVICE RETIREMENT
Title 5 USCS and the ELM (563.21) specify that any career USPS employee (CSRS or FERS) meeting retirement eligibility
requirements who is involuntarily separated and who has been employed continuously by the USPS and/or other federal agency
for at least 12 consecutive months (without a break in service of three or more consecutive days immediately prior to the
separation) is eligible for discontinued service retirement, except in the following circumstances:
The employee is not entitled to an immediate retirement annuity
if:
a. At the time of separation the employee is offered and declines
to accept a position in the USPS or in any other federal agency of like seniority, tenure, and pay within the same commuting
area.
“Commuting area” means the geographic area that usually
constitutes one area for employment purposes. It includes any population center (or two or more neighboring ones) and the
surrounding localities in which people live and reasonably can be expected to travel back and forth daily in their usual employment.
b. The employee is separated because of entry in the military
service.
c. The employee is separated for cause on charges of misconduct,
delinquency, or inefficiency.
d. The employee at the time of separation is receiving compensation
as a beneficiary of the Federal Employees Compensation Act, except when receiving this compensation concurrently with postal
pay.
For the purpose of this regulation, “separation”
means excessed or reassigned from an assignment without a comparable offer.
SEVERANCE PAY
Title 5 USCS (§5595) and ELM 435 specify that any career USPS employee (CSRS or FERS) who is
involuntarily separated and who has been employed continuously
by the USPS and/or other federal agency for at least 12 consecutive months (without a break in service of three or more consecutive
days immediately prior to the separation) is eligible for severance pay, except in the following circumstances:
a. The employee is entitled to an immediate retirement annuity
including discontinued service retirement.
b. At the time of separation, the employee is offered and declines
to accept a position in the USPS of like seniority, tenure, and pay within the same commuting area.
c. The employee is separated for cause on charges of misconduct,
delinquency, or inefficiency.
d. The employee, at the time of separation, is receiving compensation
as a beneficiary of the Federal Employees Compensation Act, except when receiving this compensation concurrently with postal
pay.
RELOCATION ALLOWANCES
The F-12 Handbook specifies that employees who are involuntarily
excessed and required to report to another installation are entitled to a relocation allowance, provided the new duty station
is at east 50 miles greater in distance than the distance between their former duty station and their former residence. When
notified that you will be involuntarily excessed to a location more than 50 miles further than the distance between your present
home and your duty station, you should request a written statement ordering your reassignment. A computer- driven notice of
reassignment or PS Form 178 will suffice as official notice. You should not volunteer to accept the new assignment. If you
volunteer for reassignment, under most circumstances you are not eligible for relocation allowances: After being notified
that you are excess, you are provided choices of locations from which you make a selection, and your reassignment continues
to be involuntary and is covered by the relocation expense regulations. In those instances when a senior employee volunteers
to be excessed in lieu of a junior employee, the senior employee should notify management that excessing is still occurring
and should be considered “involuntary” for purposes of relocation expenses. Where management refuses to authorize
relocation expenses, the employee may elect to either refuse to volunteer or write a letter to management notifying that the
relocation is not considered voluntary by the employee and that a grievance will be filed contesting the decision to refuse
payment of the allowance. To prevent any misunderstandings over your entitlement, you should insist that your reassignment
order be in writing. When provided options of different postal installations to which you may be excessed, you should always
indicate-by letter-that your selection does not represent your volunteering for reassignment. Do not accept a management offer
to voluntarily transfer because excessing is imminent or the offered position is more convenient.
These are just some of the regulations intended to help you make an informed decision if you are an
impacted or volunteer employee. There is a link to the full booklet on the Local’s website on the “Helpful Links”
page. Please feel free to contact a union representative for any other questions
or concerns you may have.
.
Hello Everyone,
Well, it has been a very hectic 11 months since I have taken office. The
local and its membership have had to endure station downsizing (right sizing as management likes to call it), sectional excessing,
bid restructuring, the upcoming move to the new St. Paul P&DC, very limited vacancy notices and the granddaddy of them all, the likelihood
of excessing outside of the installation. As we move (d) through these processes,
many of you have expressed their concern(s) about their future with the postal service, whether it be senior employees or
junior employees, it is evident everyone is concerned. I would like to assure
everyone that the union is meeting with management at every level to minimize the disruption to one’s life and family. For the record the union has been meeting with management weekly, while in reality
the meetings have turned daily. However, it is unfortunate that it appears too
many of you feel that the union is not being forthright with information. I assure
you that as the union becomes aware of management's proposed numbers and is able to garner relevant information that it will
and is forwarded on to you, the members.
You the members have been made aware of management’s proposed numbers for excessing outside of the installation,
which is 128 clerks, 106 level 6 and 22 level 7. As for clerks bid and employees
retire or transfer this overall number will change, which could impact one’s position on the excessing list. So as I have stated in the past, everything is fluid at this point and will remain that way for some time
to come.
Bear in mind that
excessing is a management decision. The agreement between the parties establishes
specific guidelines to be followed when excessing occurs. The general principle is that inconvenience and disruption is to
be kept to a minimum. It is a difficult and stressful time for everyone involved
especially the employees indentified as excess to the needs of a section or installation.
Often excessive
OT and ongoing changes to full time regular schedules, cross craft work and supervisors doing bargaining unit work follows
excessing action. This happens because management excesses too many employees
and now finds they are short staffed. If you are party to or witness any violations,
please contact a union steward and file a grievance.
On 2/25/10 the union
was invited to a district labor management meeting at the new NDC (formerly the BMC) at this meeting we were informed that
the commercial mailing industry intends on eliminating all first class mailings. The
Postal Service projects that this action will delay the financial recovery through the year 2020. The Service projects annual losses will be around 10 billion dollars a year for the next ten years.
Also, we were able
to tour the new St. Paul P&DC. The building is currently empty. The only equipment inside is the trayveyor. Completion is
scheduled for sometime between August and November 2010. As you can read there
is a lot happening.
Thank you to all
the members, stewards and officers for their dedication in these trying and testing times.

Hello Everyone, (reprinted from February 2010 Postmark)
Due to the intense and urgent nature of the requests for the details of the new facility staffing package, I will provide
the following information on the staffing package, instead of my normally formatted article.
|
Pay Location |
Staffing Impact |
|
110 |
No change |
|
120 |
Reduction of one level 6 position |
|
125 |
Addition of two level 6 positions |
|
129 |
No change to level 7, reduction of four
level 6 positions |
|
131 |
Posting two level 6 positions per grievance
|
|
145 |
Reduction of 14 level 6 positions |
|
FSS T-1 |
New section, addition of 6 level 6 positions
|
|
210 (REG) |
Reduction of one level 7 position |
|
210 (BOX) |
Reduction of three level 6 positions
|
|
225 |
No change |
|
229 |
No
change to level 7, reduction of two level 6 positions |
|
231 |
Reduction of 18 level 6 positions |
|
245 |
Reduction of 9 level 6 positions |
|
310 (BOX) |
Reduction of 1 level 6 and 1 level 7
position |
|
310 (REG) |
Reduction of 1 level 6 position |
|
325 |
Reduction of 9 level 6 positions |
|
329 |
Reduction of 4 level 6 positions and
an addition of 1 level 7 position |
|
331 |
Reduction of 6 level 6 positions |
|
345 |
Reduction of 9 level 6 positions |
|
FSS T-3 |
New section, addition of 6 level 6 positions
|
|
AMC T-1 |
Reduction of 6 level 7 positions and
an addition of two level 6 positions |
|
AMC T-2 |
Reduction of 5 level 6 positions and
a reduction of four level 7 positions |
|
AMC T-3 |
Reduction of 6 level 6 positions and
a reduction of 8 level 7 positions |
Management has notified
the local that as of 12/24/09, 106 level 6 and 22 level 7 Clerk employees will be excessed from the installation. Junior employees
to be excessed will be excessed by craft, salary level and status. Best Qualified, and part time regulars are a separate status. When excessing occurs the sole criteria for selecting employees to be excessed is
craft seniority. Whether you are recovering from either on or off the job injury
would have no bearing on being excessed. Employees in a light or limited duty
status will be excessed in the same way that employees in a full duty status are excessed, based on the pay level of the duty
assignment that they hold and their seniority.
So far, it has not been determined how the move from the old (St. Paul) installation to the new (Eagan)
installation will be completed. Management has notified the union that their
plan is to move operations to the new facility in stages, over a 1 to 3 month period beginning possibly in June or July of
this year.
As far as bidding in the new facility, it will depend on how and when management abolishes, reverts, excesses and posts
bid duty assignments. As of now, it is impossible to determine what jobs will
be posted installation wide or posted for in-section bidding.
The Local still
has not received the maintenance staffing package.
We will continue
to meet regularly with management. We will keep you informed as details become
available.

Hello Everyone
Well, another year has come and gone and still we are no
closer to knowing what the staffing of the new facility will look like. Management
has been telling your local officers that they really do want to provide us with “the numbers”. Yet every time
we ask for the staffing package we get the same old song and dance, the “event” package has been sent to the area
(Dan Foster, Labor Relations), who in turn will send it to the APWU (Sharon Stone, Regional Coordinator) who then ultimately
will provide it to the local. The bottom line is that management has not
provided the staffing for the new facility to the Region/Local because they know that there is going to be a major impact
the bargaining unit. And I believe that management also knows that you, the employees, will have something to say about the
impacts. Bear in mind, the contract provides for a response in February. Unfortunately, without this information many of you cannot make an informed decision
as to bid or not to bid, whether to begin training on a station bid, or ride the storm out.
Whatever the final outcome for staffing of the new facility is, you will be notified immediately. This last year has been full of turmoil, more than I have ever witnessed in my postal career with downsizing
the plant, stations and AO’s reverting almost every position that becomes vacant, and the constant threat of excessing
outside of the installation. Yet your Local/National officers have been diligent
in their efforts to ensure your contractual rights are not being trampled and that management adheres to the agreement it
too witnessed. These times have been stressful for all. I would like to say thank
you to the membership for your continued support of your local and to all the stewards and officers for a job well done. May the New Year bring peace, health and prosperity to everyone!
Tom Edwards
Hello Everyone, (reprinted
from the November 2009 Postmark)
Your union has been hard at work fending off management’s
attacks. To date, your union has been able to stop the closure of several Postal
Facilities, decrease the number of abolishments and hold off the excessing of any employees outside of the installation. This
is in no way of mean that management will end their assault on craft employees. In
fact, I believe that management is just getting started. The future looks bleak
for craft employees; all that I ask is that management share the pain. We were
informed that management implemented a program known as RIF (Reduction in Force). This is the service’s program for cutting cost in the management
ranks, and as far as I can see or am aware of, there has not been one SDO, MDO or any other EAS position affected in St. Paul by this program. It
appears to me that this program is similar, if not the exact same as the restructuring of the early 1990’s. Many of us have been around long enough to remember this, and all that happened of this program was that
EAS employees had their titles changed or received promotions. Remember all of
this is happening in the name of declining mail volume and revenue. We all need
to make sacrifices, that’s what the executives say whenever a company hits hard times, but yet they don’t want
to share the excess when times are good. They always look to the crafts to bear
the burden. Here are a few facts:
- Since 2000 the USPS has eliminated over 150,000 craft jobs, which is a reduction of almost 23% of the bargaining
unit workforce.
- Through July 2009 the USPS has eliminated approximately 80 million craft work hours. Roughly 39,000 craft positions.
- PMG Potter is proposing a shift to a five day delivery which would eliminate 17% of all city carrier hours. This may mean elimination of 34,000 full time regular positions.
- The USPS plans to eliminate another 90 million or so hours in 2010. that’s
approximately 43,000 more positions gone.
And
let’s not forget the coup d’etat, the implementation of the National Reassessment Process, which is designed to
force many of the injured workers out of the USPS. So, if all of these strategies
go as planned, it could equate to the reduction or elimination of over 300,000 craft jobs.
So from 2000-2010, that would result in a reduction of almost 50% of all bargaining unit positions. Let’s see how many EAS positions will be affected. Remember, we all need to sacrifice.
Respectfully
and in solidarity,
Tom Edwards,
President
Hello Everyone,
Heads Up…
Well it has begun. Management has started to implement their national
reassessment program (NRP). This program affects all limited duty employees. The first meeting of this program will take place 10/7/09. the following is reprinted from the 10/18/09 flash bulletin:
“Postal Service Now Targets
ALL Limited Duty Employees for Its National Reassessment Program
In October
2008, the St. Paul Area Local was informed that the Northland District will be entering into Phase 2 of the National Reassessment
Program for MMI employees. This program is designed to develop limited duty employees with permanent medical restrictions
resulting from a work related injury rehabilitation job offers. At this
point Phase 2 has been in place for 10 months with no meeting being scheduled with employees.
The APWU has just been informed that the USPS has developed a companion process that will target all limited duty employees. This process is not intended to replace the first program but run in tandem with the
new program. This will mean that the limited duty employees who have reached
MMI will be subjected to both processes.
Postal Service’s
National Reassessment Process – Limited Duty
On May 29,
2009 the USPS concluded its NPR-LD pilot program. The APWU has been informed
that the USPS plans to implement this program nationwide starting July 13, 2009 with “work status meetings” beginning
no sooner than July 27, 2009. the National APWU has raised significant concerns about the process and its compliance with
existing law and the USPS manuals. The National APWU has met with the Department
of Labor DFEC concerning what It sees as clear violation of the law and procedures developed by OWCP. As of yet, there have been very few answers provided.
Therefore, the St. Paul APWU
is asking all limited duty employees when contacted by USPS Management concerning their work status to immediately ask for
a Union Steward to ensure that all rights are being asserted from the beginning of the process.
The St. Paul
Area Local expects this new process to negatively impact our injured workers. To
illustrate how many employees can be expected to be impacted we are sharing the statistics that were provided to the APWU
concerning the pilot program for this new process. There were 2230 employees
who were reassessed as part of the two and a half month pilot period. Only 41%
(912) of these employees received “full day” job offers, just 30% (667) were assigned “partial day”
work (even though they were medically able to work more hours), and a devastating 29% (651) were told that there was not work
available. “
All Craft Conference
On 9/29/09 a delegation of 7 officers and I attended the all craft conference in Las Vegas. In attendance were approximately 2000 members of the clerk, maintenance and motor
vehicle crafts, as well as support services. During the conference the delegation
was addressed by many of the resident officers from Washington DC, including President Burrus. President Burrus
began his address by calling the union’s current circumstances the “best of times, and the worst of times.” Burrus outlined an ambitious agenda for the union’s future. Burrus urged the conference participants to meet the challenges that lay ahead. From the Postal Services financial crisis to the upcoming contract negotiations and the shrinking workforce. President Burrus asked members to draw strength from the union’s many achievements
and to refocus their efforts to the tasks that lay ahead.
Achievements
Many of us are experiencing the worst recession in 70 years, but yet we are largely unscathed from the turmoil millions
of American workers are facing. Garnering at least one level upgrades for every
employee, negotiating retirement and separation incentives for our members and others, helped to elect a president who represents
all that is good in our country and helped with the passage of House Resolution 22 (pre-funded retirees health care). These are some of the achievements that have been obtained during my years as a member
and officer of the APWU, and there are many more. Although it may be difficult
to maintain these achievements in the coming years, it is our opportunity to relish these accomplishments.
Challenges
We are experiencing unprecedented excessing and reassignments, P&DC consolidations, station and branch closings,
contracting out our work, congressional interference as related to the collective bargaining process, national reassignment
program, under staffing, declining mail volume and management performing more and more bargaining unit work. Of course, these are not all of the challenges we face, there are many more.
We must remain vigilant in these times. The future of the APWU rests with us.
Longtime President Moe Biller frequently closed his articles with the saying “The struggle continues” and
as you can see, it truly does.
Respectfully and in solidarity,
Tom Edwards, President

Democracy Does Work! It’s up to
you to do your part! - from the September 2009 Postmark
Please contact your congressional representatives and urge them to support the following bills. Action is needed by all APWU members to help ensure the Postal Service’s financial viability and
business viability. Your involvement will also help protect and strengthen postal
workers’ financial viability into retirement. Your representatives’ contact information is provided below.
HR 658 “Access to Postal Services
Act”
This bill would modify the procedure the US Postal Service has to follow before it can consolidate or close postal
facilities to require an assessment of the need to close/consolidate, require 90 days notice to each facility, allow for appeals
of the closing to the Postal Rate Commission and eliminate any economic reason for closing.
HR 22 “United States Postal Service Financial Relief Act of 2009”
This bill would eliminate the requirement that the Postal
Service “pre-fund” its annuities for retirees saving approximately five billion dollars per year.
HR 168
“Mail Network Protection Act of 2009”
Legislation would require the postal service to enter into
negotiations with postal unions prior to subcontracting mail processing to the private sector.
HR 235
“Social Security Fairness Act of 2009”
Would repeal the windfall elimination provision and the government
pension offset rules that unfairly limit social security payments to civil service retirees.
HR 1409
and S 560 “Employee Free Choice Act of 2009”
Modifies and loosens many of the national labor relations
board requirements for employees in a business to form a union. It makes it easier
for employees to unionize their workplace.
HR 958 To amend title 5, United States Code, to make unused sick leave
creditable, for purposes of the Federal Employees' Retirement System, in the same manner as provided for under the Civil Service
Retirement System.
This bill would allow government employees under Federal
Employees Retirement System (FERS) to have unused sick leave in full month increments credited toward their seniority for
retirement pension computations.
These are some but not all of the issues currently affecting
Postal Workers both active and retired. Please take the time to contact your
representatives. The job you save and the life you change by your actions may
be your own.
Respectfully
and in solidarity
Tom
Edwards, President

Hello Everyone,
As I sit and write this article, management is continuing
their assault on postal employees. Most of you are aware that we are in a continuous and ongoing battle over the decimation
of our jobs. Management has waged a tour compression campaign which affects some
of our most senior and junior employees via loss of days off, list of tour, closing of facilities, combining of facilities,
excessing, without etc., etc. Now I understand their reasoning, mail volumes
are down, which in turn decreases revenue, which in turn requires adjustments to the work force and business practices. But for the life of me, I cannot understand how shifting the workforce to tour three
and tour one will decrease the service’s expenditures. In fact, it will
result in increased night differential and increased Sunday premium pay for a greater number of employees resulting in an
increased bottom line for the service.
The following is a response from National President Bill
Burrus to John Dirzius, President of the National President’s Conference:
“Thank you for your inquiry. Below is an update on national issues regarding the USPS policy of “Tour Compression”. The national union filed an unfair labor practice change with the National Labor Relations
Board on 11/25/08, contesting management’s refusal to negotiate with the union prior to initiating the change. The charge is pending a decision by the NLRB.
The ULP alleges that management failed to bargain over the nation wide plan to consolidate mail processing into two
tours – a plan that would eliminate or greatly reduce the number of assignments on tour 2. The charge also asserts that the Postal Service failed to provide information to the union regarding this
initiative; in addition, the charge says the APWU could “show that the Postal Service answered the Union’s request for information
dishonestly.” When the APWU requested documentation detailing the program
in October 2008, management denied that it was “considering or is in the process of implementing a nationwide program
establishing a two tour operation, which is intended to eliminate or greatly reduce tour 2 assignments, operations, and staffing.” The Postal Service also wrote, regarding your request to produce documentation regarding
any nationwide or region or district wide program, plans or initiatives to eliminate or reduce tour 2 operations and/or tour
2 staffing, no such documentation exists.” The APWU requested immediate
injunctive relief, asserting that without such relief the initiative would be completed before the board would be able to
address the charge.
The union also initiated two step 4 grievances on December
16, 2008, contesting the program. The first, HQTG200819, challenged management’s authority to initiate the changes without
providing the union the required 90 days advance notice at the national level and the required 6 month advance notice at the
regional level. I discussed this grievance with management’s representative
on January 30, 2009 and have promised a written proposal for resolution during the week of 3/30/09. Upon receipt of the management’s proposal, I will either pursue a final resolution of the issue or
initiate an appeal to arbitration. The objective of the grievance is to clarify
that the USPS union and APWU at the national level agree that Article 12.5.5B.4 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement requires
management to notify the union up to 6 months in advance whenever possible before the Postal Service undertakes reassignments
such as the tour compression.” Our goal is to reach agreement that no “interpretive
issue” is involved in the reassignment of employees; if agreement can be reached on this principle, disputes will be
refer to the local parties to determine if it was possible for management to provide the required notice prior to reassigning
employees.
The second step 4 dispute, HQTG200820, focuses on management’s
violation of Article 17.5.B.4, which requires the Postal Service to discus new initiatives with eh union during the development
stage, and to bargain in good faith. The APWU learned of management’s plan
from local union officials and did receive notification of the plan from the Postal Service until after the ULP and step 4
disputes were filed. The dispute also asserts that the USPS failed and refused
to provide the APWU with relevant information requested by the union. In response
to a written request for documentation regarding any “nationwide or region or district-wide program, plans or initiatives
to eliminate or reduce tour 2 operations and/or staffing”, the Postal Service informed the APWU that “no such
documentation exists.” However, evidence shows that the two tour initiative
is, in fact, nationwide in scope and that it was initiated by the Postal Service at the national level. The Step 4 also asserts
that the plan violates the parties “commitment to protect day shift assignments.
Management’s actions violate Article 7.1.B.4 and the Memorandum of Understanding regarding the Supplemental Workforce
and the conversion of Clerk Craft Part Time Flexibles. The protection of existing
tour 2 assignments was central to the historic agreement reached in 2006 contract negotiations. Industrial Relations Director Greg Bell
met with a USPS representative to discuss this grievance on 1/21/09, Fifteen day statements of the issues and facts involved
in the dispute were exchanged on 2/13/09, and the dispute was appealed to arbitration on 2/17/09.
This is what is being done at the National Level; locally
we are utilizing every tool available to us to minimize the impact to our membership.
President Tom Edwards
Hello Everyone,
I would like to take this time to write about House Resolution
22. this resolution is very important to all of us as postal workers. What is the APWU’s role in helping get legislative relief from the USPS payment for pre-funding retiree’s
health insurance – 58 billion over 10 years?
As many of you are aware, the survival of the Postal Service
is not guarantee. Now, some people will argue that the Postal Service is Constitutionally protected and that it is not a business to be operated for profit,
but in fact, it is a service that is rendered for profit or loss. Regardless of my stance on this debate, there is one thing
for sure I am convinced of. Congress is busy bailing out the financial fat cats,
the automobile industry and the like, but a public service that touches virtually every American citizen here and abroad is
left unaided. The service we provide is a necessity for many Americans and should
be at the top of any economic relief package considered by Congress.
HR-11, a bill introduced January 6, 2009, requires government
contributions for health benefits for an individual who first becomes an annuitant by reason of retirement from employment
with the United States Postal Service on or after July 1, 1971, or for their survivor or for a survivor of an employee who
died on or after that date while employed by the Service. Payment is first made
by the Service’s retiree benefits fund up to the amount deposited in the fund with any remaining amount to be paid by
the Service. (current law requires contributions
be paid by the Service through September 30, 2016).
I ask and urge all of you to contact your representatives
and senators and ask them to support this bill. We
all have an interest in the Service’s sound financial future, the Service’s future is our future.
THANK YOU
Tom Edwards, President
I would
like to say thank you to all who voted for and supported me for the office of the President.
I look forward to the challenges of administering to this great Local. I
realize there are many issues confronting us as an organization, past, present and in the future. I look forward to working with the members and all the duly elected officers and stewards. Together we will make a great team.
In closing
I would like to say thank you to Pat McCann for his dedication and ongoing fight for our members and the union movement.

Articles from Past President McCann:
Regional Excessing
Meeting Produces Little Agreement
Pat
McCann
On Thursday, Feb. 26, 2009, the Union met with management
regarding the notification to excess 43 employees from the St. Paul, MN installation.
Attending the meeting were USPS representatives from Headquarters
and the Western Area. Attending for the APWU was Central Region Coordinator Sharyn
Stone, National Business Agent Central Region Willie Mellen, along with me and Vice President Dawn Ecker.
This meeting was supposed to occur prior to the information
received on 1/6/09 but in typical management fashion, it was done ass backwards. This
resulted in some heated exchanges involving the inaccurate information that management presented to the Union
on the day of the meeting.
Further complicating matters was the information provided
appeared to be gathered and assembled the day before so those management reps presenting the information where less than knowledgeable
on the material they were presenting, which led to an unproductive meeting.
From the Union’s perspective, the information provided
at the meeting was inaccurate and does not support a need to excess employees from the St.
Paul installation. We did agree at the meeting that if
management provides accurate information that supports the need to excess and complies with Article 12 of the Contract that
excessing will occur no sooner than July 2009.
Since this process adjusts every time there is attrition
in the bargaining unit, the parties have agreed to meet at the local level to adjust the number of employees to be excessed.
Since the initial notification to excess 43 employees was
received in January 2009, management has adjusted the number to 35 employees. The
union believes that this number is not supported by accurate information. From the data we have it appears at this point in
time we’re at 10 employees to be excessed and that number will be further reduced as we get closer to July 2009.
This is going to be a long, drawn out process, so please
bear with us as we work to protect your rights under the contract. I will update
you via bulletins as we move through the process.
A Goal Set, A Goal Met
By Pat McCann
The St. Paul, MN Area Local
has again risen to the challenge to raise money for our Committee on Political Action (COPA).
For the calendar year 2008 members of the St. Paul Local contributed a total of $12,303.22 to COPA. This is an increase over year 2007’s donations in the amount of $1400.74.
We met and exceeded our
goal by raising $12,303.22.
In 2008 we increased those contributing bi-weekly from 76
members to 83 members. We also saw an increase in overall donators from 145 members
in 2007 to 154 members contributing to COPA in 2008.
What do all these numbers mean? Since COPA began, we have seen our members become increasingly more involved in our Political Action Committee. We’ve seen a steady increase of the years of members contributing bi-weekly
and annually. Also there has been more involvement during elections with phone
banking and door knocking.
This all points to the fact that you, the members, are stepping
up to the plate and recognizing the importance of political involvement.
The next couple of years are going to be challenging to the
USPS with mail volume failing because of the faltering economy, the USPS will faced with decisions that if implemented (eliminating
6 day delivery, consolidating processing plants, closing post offices, funding retiree healthcare, etc) will have devastating
effects on our members. The USPS can take these actions in most cases without
violating our Collective Bargaining Agreement.
One of the avenues in which we can have our voices heard
on these issues is through our Congressional Representatives. COPA provides President Burrus and our Legislative Director
Myke Reid along with Assistant Legislative Director Steve Albanese the opportunity to access members of Congress from both
sides of the aisle that will influence a good majority of the decisions the USPS will make in the coming months.
On a broader scale, the Labor Movement is constantly under
attack by corporations attempting to introduce legislation to erode workers’ ability to bargain on behalf of their members. Hopefully with the change that occurred in the last election cycle, we will be able
to spend less time defeating onerous legislation put forward by corporations and actually enact legislation that improves
the lives of the working class.
This can only be accomplished by being involved in politics
on Capitol Hill. Involvement is made possible through COPA.
I would like to thank those who contributed to COPA in 2008. I would also like to thank Bruce Gutzke, COPA Coordinator for his tireless work. Great job Bruce!
Lastly, I hope that those who supported COPA in 2008 will
continue to do so in 2009. for those who missed the opportunity to contribute in 2008, I challenge you to help us reach our
goal of $12,500.00 in 2009 so that we continue to have a healthy political action fund, allowing our voices to be collectively
heard on Capitol Hill.

Changes, Changes
and More Changes
Pat McCann
As we begin the new year, we leave behind a year that was
full of change to our working environment.
We experienced a reduction in staffing at our stations and
branches, along with reposting of bids and changing start times/days off. The
plant saw the final phase of decentralization take place in city division and the elimination of one FSM 1000, causing abolishments
on tour 1 and tour 3.
Motor vehicle experienced run adjustments and the potential
loss of 5 positions through attrition.
The maintenance craft seemed to fair better when it came
to change. We actually saw an increase in our custodial occupational group with
a number of employees transferring into the management craft from the clerk craft and the mailhandler craft.
As we begin the new year, we are faced with the tour 2 compression
initiative. Initially this is going to affect the clerk craft in letter automation
on all three tours with abolishments and reposting of duty assignments and start time changes.
Eventually this could spread to the flat operation at a later date.
The tour 2 compression will also affect motor vehicle craft
employees with an adjustment to their runs to stations and branches.
Maintenance staffing and start times for employees who work
on the machines may at some point see adjustments based on the tour 2 compression initiative
For the clerks and motor vehicle employees, their changes
will start in January 2009 and be completed in February 2009.
The registry section was also a target for management to
reduce work hours. Management will be abolishing two (2) positions on tour 3
and reposting another.
At the Air Mail Center, management will be abolishing 2 ramp clerk positions and will revert one open
position.
This spring the Mail
Recovery Center is slated to be closed with
the work being moved to the Atlanta mail recovery center. This will affect approximately 50 clerks.
So the first four (4) months of 2009 will be extremely unsettling
for our members.
On the positive side, through all this change, no employee
has been excessed from the installation and forced to move in order to continue employment with the Post Office. This has not been the case in numerous installations across the country where employees have had to relocate
in order to keep their employment with the Postal Service.
After these changes take place in early 2009, I think we
will experience a brief period of stability. I say this because I believe that in fall of 2009 the decrease in mail volume
will start to level off. Our ratio between the number of duty assignments (bids)
versus employees will be virtually equal, thus requiring management to be much more thoughtful in managing duty assignments
in each section because of the requirement to have equal number of bids for employees. This coupled with economists predicting
that the economy will start showing signs of recovery in late 2009. That said, the move to Eagan in late 2010, early 2011 has the potential for serious disruption to our work environment
depending on what the USPS categorizes the new building as will determine the level of disruption.
On the bright side, employment with the USPS even with rough
economic times continues to be stable employment.

DESTRUCTION OF TOUR 2 PICKS UP SPEED
by Pat McCann
In
the past three weeks, we have been notified by management that they intend on moving Tour 2 Letter Automation to a 12:05 p.m.
start time and eliminating the Mail Recovery Center
in St. Paul which is a Tour 2 operation. Furthermore, there is rumbling that Tour 2 Flat operations may suffer the same fate in the near future.
Through
correspondence with other APWU Presidents around the country, they report that their processing plants are suffering the same
fate. This indicates that this is USPS Headquarters’ driven initiative. Therefore, APWU Presidents from around the country have requested that President Burrus
assist us in dealing with this issue. A teleconference has been set for December
3, 2008 to discuss the issues.
I
don’t believe this is something that is going to be solved through the grievance procedure because it does not appear
to be a Contract violation. I believe a dialogue has to take place with those
at USPS Headquarters who have made these decisions and they appear to have been made at the highest levels of the USPS. I say this because we have tried locally to open dialogue with the Plant Manager on
these changes to no avail. The Plant Manager had indicated he does not have a
choice in these matters.
MOVE TO EAGAN
UPDATE
Excavating
contractors have begun prepping the site for construction of the new building. The
completion date of the new facility is late 2010, early 2011. We will probably
begin meetings on the move mid-season of 2009. We will keep you informed in the
move through the process.

THE ELECTION IS OVER – NOW WHAT?
by Pat McCann
The answer is, let’s hold our elected representatives accountable!
All too often after Election Day, we go back to our daily activities and assume that our elected representatives will
fight for the interests of the working class/middle class/main street America, for which we elected them, but more often than
not, we get ignored in the process because we ignore the process. This has to
change. We must stay active in the process.
If you believe for one moment that the lobbyist who advocated for legislation that has severely and negatively impacted
the working class/middle class/ main street America are going to stand down because we have changed the playing field where
the game is played, you are mistaken. They are going to fight tooth and toenail
to keep in place every piece of legislation that has been passed that has put us in the position we are in today.
If we don’t put as much effort into lobbying our representatives for the changes we elected them to make as we
did in getting them elected, then we will have squandered a once in our lifetime chance to make a positive difference for
organized labor, working class America and main street America.
So, on January 20, 2009, let’s be ready to participate in the process and make positive changes for the working
people of America. If we let this opportunity
slip by, shame on us.
Members,
we have reached a point in our postal careers where the election on November 4, 2008 will more than likely determine the direction
of our employment with the United States Postal Service.
The
Postal Service is caught in what I would call the perfect storm that could lead to privatization without intervention from
Congress and the next President.
The
storm began with the introduction of the internet and the avenues it provided for people to connect with each other electronically.
Since the invention of the internet, first class mail volume, which was the bread and butter of the Postal Service, has continued
to decrease at record rates. Initially standard mail volume was off-setting the
decrease in first class mail volume, but now the Postal Service is experiencing volume reductions in standard mail.
The
storm continued to pick up strength with the introduction of postal reform by the Bush Administration, passed by a Republican
Controlled House and Senate, a law that severely hamstrings the Post Office’s ability to navigate through an economy
that is in recession.
Under
the law, the only means for the USPS to recover losses due to the economy:
·
Significant productivity improvement (nothing significant on the horizon in technology
that will change productivity)
·
Invoking the law’s exigency clause (increasing postage rates above the rate of
inflation, it permits such increase in extraordinary or exceptional circumstances). Invoking this would most likely drive
down mail volume.
The
final piece of the perfect storm is the economic recession. Companies that use
the Postal Service to distribute their advertising have begun to cut back and we are seeing a dramatic decrease in standard
mail volumes (flats and letters). This, coupled with the price of gas having
risen to $3.50 a gallon, equates to the Postal Service losing 2.3 billion dollars this year, and a projected loss of 2 billion
in Fiscal Year 2009.
If
the economy continues on its current path, and it most likely will for at least at minimum another year, the
Postal Service will continue to run a deficit. So the Postal Service is basically
left with 4 options:
1.
Reduce operating expenses by reducing the number one operating expense, “employees”. This will speed up the march to privatization.
2.
Raise the rates under the law to match inflation.
Raising rates sharply will force major mailers to sharply reduce or abandon hard copy communication in favor of alternatives,
furthering the call for privatization.
3.
Increase mail volume. This is not likely to happen during an economic recession.
4.
Use its authority under the law to borrow up to 15 billion dollars to continue operating. Borrowing money will increase the drumbeat for privatization.
The
outlook for employees of the United States Postal Service is bleak, but all is not lost.
Before
private companies are allowed to pick apart the Post Office, the 800 pound gorilla (the President and Congress) will weigh
in on the future role of government in providing postal service to the nation.
This
is where we, as postal employees and voters, can make a game changing move by electing a President, a Senator and Congresspersons
who support federal jobs, who support the middle class, to which we belong, and who believe in the basic right to organize
for better wages and working conditions.
The
time will come, most likely within the next 4 years, that the fate of the Postal Service will be decided.
Do
you want John McCain, Norm Coleman and Michelle Bachman and John Kline, who favor privatization of federal jobs; or Barack
Obama, Al Franken, 1st District Tim Waltz; 2nd District Steve Sarvi; 3rd District Ashwin Madia; 4th District Betty McCollum;
5th District Keith Ellingson; 6th District El Tinklenberg; 7th District Collin Peterson; and 8th District Jim Oberstar who
believe in and will fight for public service jobs?
Bluntly
put, as postal employees, you have been secure enough in your employment to vote for candidates based on a variety of issues
not related to your job. Those days have reached an end. This election is about your job.
_____________________________________________
COLA Increase
- $1,477 – Will Be Highest in History
Thanks to a cost-of-living adjustment that will be the highest in APWU bargaining history, postal workers
represented by the union will be receiving an annual raise of $1,477 at the end of the month.
The increase is the result of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rise during the six months of the most recent Cost-of-Living
measuring period under the 2006-2010 Collective Bargaining Agreement.
“This is not only the largest COLA increase under the current contract,”
said President William Burrus, “but the largest such raise we’ve
ever achieved.”
The COLA will be effective August 30, and will be reflected in September 19 paychecks.
The adjustment will amount to a 71-cent per hour increase, or $56.80 per pay period.
The CPI for July, the last month in the measuring period, was released August 14, and represents the completion of
the fourth six-month COLA period in the 2006 National Agreement.
“Cost-of-living adjustments make important contributions to our members’ wages,” Burrus said. “APWU members who began in 2008 at Level 5 Step O will realize an increase of
nearly $3,200 per year as a result of the February upgrade and the March and August COLAs.”
There will be four more COLA adjustments under the latest contract. Employees
received a $686 raise on September 1, 2007 and a $479 raise on March 15.
With the latest adjustment, the COLA increases in the current contract will total $2,642.
FLAT MAIL VOLUME DROPS MANAGEMENT ELIMINATION UFSM 1000 MACHINE -from
the September Postmark
by Pat McCann, President
The union was notified in a letter dated August 8, 2008 that they would be “restructuring” the UFSM 1000
operation by taking out of service one (1) UFSM 1000 machine. The impact to the
Clerk Craft would be on Tour 1 and Tour 3. There was no reported impact to the
Maintenance Craft.
At the meeting with management, they basically showed us the volume drop in Flats since the rate increase (shape based
pricing) and the corresponding throughput numbers supporting their decision to eliminate one machine.
Management is in the process of putting together a staffing package for Tour 1 and Tour 3 for the remaining machine.
Once they have that completed, they have agreed to meet with the affected units.
A union representative will be present at the meetings to answer questions from the members concerning their contractual
rights.
UPDATE
ON MOVE TO EAGAN - from the May 2008 Postmark
By Pat McCann, President
Approximately three (3) weeks ago,
the Postal Board of Governors met and approved the sale of the concourse and parking lot to the Ramsey County Rail Authority. The Post Office building itself was not part of the deal.
Apparently Ramsey County has funds already allocated for
this purchase and are working out the details of the purchase with the USPS. I
don’t have any information at this time as to when the final agreement will be signed.
The union has begun to make inquiries as to the affect this will have on employee parking after the purchase is completed.
As for the future site in Eagan, the parties (USPS, Dakota
County, City of Eagan) still have not come to an agreement on where vehicles will access and egress to the facility and who
will pay for it.
As you can see, the project
is still moving along at a snail’s pace and it does not appear that it is going to pick up speed anytime soon.
The Function 4 Merry Go Round
Continues -from the April 2008 Postmark
Over the past several
months the union has met on Function 4 staffing packages for some of the stations and branches (Eagan,
Industrial, Apple Valley, Main Office, and Woodbury).
After several meetings in appears management’s directions is to start reposting positions where there is heavy
overtime usage on Mondays. Apparently, management believes by reposting some
positions to 5 week rotations, they will be able to significantly reduce Monday overtime.
Does this sound like the same old song and dance routine we heard 3 years ago from then Postmaster Cindy Larson right
before she proceeded to repost almost the entire city from 10 week rotation to 6 week rotation? The reason she gave for reposing positions was too much overtime on Saturdays. The union explained to Postmaster Cindy Larson that unless management staffed the station with the proper
number of clerks to cover days off, annual leave (10%-14% depending on time of year) and sick leave usage, reposting positions
would just chase the overtime to another day, and guess what? The other day is
now Monday.
The sad part about what happened 3 years ago besides the fact that it disrupted the lives of our members, is that management
appears not to have learned a single thing from it and is on the verge of repeating it again.
It took almost 2 ½ years for things to begin to settle down from the last repostings.
As an example, almost the entire work force at the Apple Valley
post office bid out of the office after the reposting. The result was a staffing crisis that caused numerous contract violations
and financially cost the Post Office thousands of dollars.
I have been meeting periodically with Postmaster Mike Larson, not on any particular office, but in general on the function
four process in an attempt to avoid repeating the disaster that occurred 2 ½ years ago.
We continue to have constructive discussions on this issue and no repostings have occurred yet.
Vice-President Dawn Ecker has been meeting with each individual station manager to go over the 1994’s. To date
none of the function 4’s have been finalized. Once we have completed the
meetings on the 1994’s and have a finalized package, we will share the information with the members via station visits
or a bulletin.
FMLA
Under Attack – reprinted from the March 2008 Postmark
President Bush’s appointed henchmen at the Department of Labor are at it again.
They are proposing changes to the Family Medical Leave Act that if implemented, will most certainly negatively affect
the very workers that the Act was supposed to protect.
Of course it is not surprising the employers are at the forefront in pushing the DOL to modify provisions of the Law
to tilt the landscape in their favor.
The Law was enacted during the Clinton administration
and for more than a decade has made a positive impact on millions of workers and thousands of postal workers and their families.
Some of the changes being proposed that would affect postal workers:
· Current regulations prohibit employers from
making direct contact with an employee’s physician. The proposed rules would create exceptions to this prohibition.
· Eligible employees would be required to re-certify
lifelong or chronic conditions at least twice a year, regardless of the length of the certification issued by a healthcare
provider. (Employees would have to bear the costs of the additional trips to the doctor.) Under current regulations, such
certifications last up to a year.
· Current regulation prohibit the disclosure
of a “diagnosis or prognosis” on any form. The proposed rule would allow employers to request but not require
disclosure.
· While the proposed regulations would allow
eligible employees to seek damages against employers who fail to provide them proper notice of their rights under the FMLA,
the burden of proof in such cases would be quite high and employees would have to show actual damages suffered.
· Current regulations stipulate that a health
problem can qualify as a serious condition when an absence is followed by two visits with a healthcare provider. The proposed
regulations would restrict FMLA eligibility by requiring that follow-up treatment take place within 30 days of the start of
a medical absence.
· Current law
requires employers to provide notice to employees within two business days. The proposed rule expands the period to five business
days.
Right now as it stands, FMLA is a fairly
easy benefit for workers to access. It doesn’t require a huge amount of
hurdles to get coverage but enough to discourage individuals from continually abusing the system. Yes, I know there are individuals who are and will continue to abuse FMLA, but there enough regulations
in the current law if the employers chose to enforce it, that would clean up the abuses.
Instead, it appears that employers are pushing the DOL to make FMLA a more cumbersome benefit to access by implementing
less worker-friendly regulations requiring more doctor visits, more paperwork and so on.
One does not need to look far to see where this is headed if the regulations are changed.
When DOL, Office of Worker Compensation Program first come into existence, it was a fairly worker friendly benefit
to access. If you got injured at work and had to miss work because of the injury
or required medical treatment, you filled out a couple of forms and got paid for the missed work hours and your medical bills
were paid by the employer without too much hassle. Not anymore, once employers
began to pressure the DOL for more regulations in regard to the OWCP, the benefit became a paperwork nightmare with endless
doctor’s visits, unpaid medical bills and so on. In the end, employees
for the most part have given up in regards to getting compensated for work injuries, in the most part because of the massive
paperwork involved and continued harassment by the employer to get coverage. In
the end, the employers got what they wanted, a benefit so entangled in regulations that it paralyzed employee’s ability
to access it.
This is exactly what they (employers) are up to with the changes they have proposed for FMLA and this is just the start.
Before these changes can be implemented, the DOL is required to take public comments on the proposed changes. The APWU plans to file objections during the 60 day comment period.
Once again, the St.
Paul, MN Area Local has risen to the challenge facing us in the area
of political action. In 2007, members of the local contributed a total of $10,902.48
to the Committee on Political Action (COPA). This is an increase over 2006 donations in the amount of $537.98.
In 2007 we increased those who contribute bi-weekly from
65 to 76. The committee had set a goal of reaching 76 and we reached it.
The above would not have been achieved without you, the members,
recognizing the importance of contributing to a political action fund.
COPA provides President Burrus the opportunity to access
members of Congress from both sides of the aisle that make decisions on legislation put forth affecting our working environment
as postal workers. It also helps when the APWU wants legislation introduced such
as Bill (HR 4236) which would affect private contracts involving mail processing, mail handling, or surface transportation
of mail if signed into law; as it would require the USPS to bargain with the affected unions before awarding such contracts.
In 2008 we will be again faced with further attempts by the
USPS to consolidate and/or close post offices. This, along with, the always present
attempts to privatize the USPS are why the APWU needs to stay active in the political arena.
The APWU has been able to thwart a number of consolidations of processing centers around the country by enlisting congressional
support for our position. On a broader scale, the labor movement is constantly under attack by the corporations attempting
to introduce legislation to erode unions’ ability to bargain on behalf of their members.
The APWU has been able to thwart a number of consolidations
of processing centers around the country by enlisting congressional support for our position.
This can only be accomplished by being involved in politics
on Capitol Hill. Involvement is made possible through our Committee on Political
Action (COPA).
I would like to thank those who contributed to COPA in 2007.
I have listed your names on page _________. I would also like to thank Bruce
Gutzke, our COPA Coordinator for his tireless work. Great job Bruce!
Lastly, I hope that those who supported COPA in 2007 will
continue to do so in 2008, and for those who missed your opportunity to contribute in 2007, I challenge you to contribute
to COPA in 2008 so that we continue to have a healthy political action fund so that our voices are collectively heard on Capitol
Hill.
Pat McCann
President
|