St. Paul, MN Area Local APWU
Home
Call to Action
Latest Flash Bulletin
Scholarship Info!
Legislative Action
Bulletins 2010
Bulletins 2009
Older Bulletins 2006-2008
President's Page
Stewards and Officers
Clerk Craft
Motor Vehicle Service
Maintenance Craft
APWU Health Plan
For all Members
Membership Meeting Schedule
Uniform Vendors
Helpful Links
In the News
Retiree's Corner
Why Be a Member?
President's Page

The year 2011 was year of transition for the St. Paul APWU.  We moved out of our offices on the river bluffs in St. Paul to Mendota.  With that move brought the ratification of a new contract by our members that saw many changes.  In fact, more changes were agreed to in this present Contract than all the previous contracts combined.  Much of this year has been struggling to figure out how the new language is implemented.  Almost immediately, because of the new language the National APWU filed four Step 4 grievances concerning the new contract.  Two of these Step 4 Grievances were presented in front of an Arbitrator in December 2011.  Further, locally because of the ratification of the new contract we entered into LMOU negotiations with the offices we represent.  Forty of the forty-one offices that we represent were able to agree and we will be sending out LMOU to all these members in the near future. However, the St. Paul Installation saw many items go to Impasse.  Right now, the parties at the Area level are trying to reach agreement on the outstanding issues.  If no agreement is reached Arbitration will be schedule late January or early February to resolve the disputed  issues.As we look forward to 2012, it will be a very busy year.  Management has provided the Union with their staffing proposals for all the stations and branches, in St. Paul.  There is much to disagree on in these packages.  The Union is meeting with management to provide input and alternatives to management’s proposals.  Further, it is anticipated that management at the St. Paul Processing Plant in Eagan will roll out some sort of NTFT assignments, just not sure how many and to what extent yet. We are hopeful that management will fill the openings in Vehicle Maintenance and Custodians in the near future.  On the political front there are presently 19 congressional bills that propose to fix the Postal Service.  I use the work fix sarcastically because Congress created the financial problems at the USPS.  However, with the financial crisis looming the USPS proposed closing all the Processing and Distribution Centers in the Northland district except St. Paul and Minneapolis.  Postal Management has agreed with the Senate to hold the decision concerning these closures until May.  If these closures go through we will see many changes to bids in the Processing Plant.  Last, 2012 is an election year, we need to develop a plan to support and elect Congress members that support working people and our issues.  I hope as the election approaches our members will get involved in whatever way they are able to help this happen.  Our jobs and future depend on it.We will continue to fight and struggle on behalf of the members of this local for better working conditions and a better future.

Horizontal Divider 1


Happy Thanksgiving and Merry Christmas, to all the members.

 
I hope all find something to be thankful for this holiday season.  The first week of December, the USPS is scheduling public meetings concerning closing three offices that we represent, Seeger Square, Mendota, and Riverview. 

Please watch for the notices of the meetings and encourage your friends and family to oppose these closings.  Each office serves a need within its community and needs to remain open.

On a similar vein, consolidations of Area Mail Processing Centers in Minnesota are continuing.  We were just informed this week that Duluth has been forwarded to the Area and National USPS for consideration and they are having a public meeting in Duluth on November 10th.  If it is decided to close the Duluth Plant, it will affect many employees who currently work there.  I know first hand how these closings impacts families from when I was working with those employees that were being excessed when we moved to the new building. 

This consolidation will take it toll.  In order for this to happen the USPS will have to change its delivery standards from overnight to 2-3 days.  Personally, I think this is a bad idea all around, even though it would mean opening up day jobs within the Eagan Plant to process this mail. 
Now that Local Negotiations have ended and Impasse items have been sent to the next level, staffing has taken front and center.  This month we will have to deal with the re-bidding of all the MVS routes, staffing for all the Customer Service Offices we represent, and lastly custodial staffing is a concern. 

The new Contract requires management to create desirable duty assignments from all available hours.  It also provides the Union the opportunity to provide input and provide alternatives.  If the Union does not agree with the staffing, there is an alternative dispute process to resolve the dispute between the parties.  The problem we have on the clerk side, is that management has not given us the opportunity to participate in this process. 

Last week, for the level 21 and above Associate Offices and the Customer Service in St. Paul management met with us and said you have to ok this in an hour.  This is not in compliance with the National Agreement and the St. Paul APWU disputed each new job posting. We are not sure at this point if the jobs will be posted for bid or not.  This first process was to create NTFT assignments to take the place of the PTR positions that went away on August 27, 2011. 

However, management indicated to us that by November 15th they will have all the  new 1994’s staffing packages and will be looking to meet on these the week of Thanksgiving.  They have already indicated that they intend to reduce jobs in Customer Service. 


n Clerk Craft side, Director Gutzke has assembled a team of stewards to input data and analyze it to provide  alternatives for the dispute process. Also, management has proposed 21 NTFT assignments consisting of 32 hours a week.  We have had preliminary discussions on this concept while not specifically seeing what has been proposed.  Management decided not to post this bids in early November bid cycle. 


MVS Director Cook and Trustee Henjum are working very hard on the re-bidding process for the drivers.  The latest staffing package sent to us is unacceptable and if management refuses to modify it we will be in dispute with these positions also.


Lastly, the Senate has introduced its plan to save the USPS.  Now, there is HR 2309, Senate Bill P-21, and the Super Committee all with competing ideas on how to save the USPS.  At this point, we not sure what is going to happen but we need to stay involved as members and call, write, and visit our Congressman to save our quality of life.  All the versions in their present format make the employee of the USPS take a hit for the financial crisis that Congress created.  Please continue to stay involved and motivated to help each other in this difficult time.

Horizontal Divider 1

 Local Negotiations -       

Local Negotiations have been completed in all 40 of our associate offices, including Amery which joined us after the last contract.  So, Amery will be getting their very first LMOU.  All Associate Office LMOU's were opened because the newly negotiated National Agreement has many changes that affect each LMOU. We were able to agree on language for the newly created Postal Support Employee a non-career category of employee that we represent.  They will be given a Wednesday prior schedule just like PTF's that is subject to change according to service needs. 

They will given access to the Annual Leave procedures established in each office.  PSEs were incorporated into the pecking order for those LMOU that have overtime and holiday pecking orders.  

 Also, all LMOU's that had leave procedures that stated "eight hours or more" for leave purposes were changed to “one scheduled day” to accommodate the Non-Tradition Full Time assignments. Local Negotiations for the St. Paul Installation will be proceeding to Impasse. 

The Union would not agree to Management proposals to do away with your guaranteed right to take leave within the quota.  Management want to be able to  determine service needs for you to take leave.  The Union found these proposals simply unacceptable.  Now, management is going to have to prove an undue  burden on this issue.  The St. Paul APWU will vigorously defend this existing language that has served this Installation so well.  

 Also, Management is taking to impasse a proposal to lengthen the time it takes to put some into a duty assignment from 15 days to 28 days.  The Union disagreed with this proposal and asserted that in the day of the computer they should be able to put people in bids quicker not slower.  In addition, the Union argued that by keeping an needed duty assignment unfilled creates a financial burden on management to utilized overtime to fill the unfilled assignment.   The St. Paul Local also took proposals to incorporate the newly established Postal Support Employee into the LMOU where appropriate.  Management stated that they were under no obligation to negotiate with the Union on new PSE language in the LMOU.  The Union disagreed and explained that the new language would provide clear direction in which to schedule PSEs for weekly and daily schedules as well as overtime and holidays.  The Union also believes that the proposal follows an established history between the parties on the issue of non-career employee that we represent. 

Remember the TEs the proposals that were presented followed the same language the parties agreed to LMOU's when we had them. 
Until these issues are resolved the existing language of our LMOU are to be followed.  The Union will provide information as this issue progresses.  Thanks for your patience and support on this.  There was just no way that the St. Paul APWU was willing to eliminate the guaranteed annual leave provisions in the LMOU. 

Horizontal Divider 1

This summer has gone by extremely fast.  There have been many issues the St. Paul APWU has been dealing with this summer. 
The biggest issue is with the new contract and understanding what the new language means.  This has been difficult in that the parties at National Level seem to have many disagreements over what the language meant that they negotiated.  This has resulted in numerous National level grievance filed over Management’s implementations of the agreement.  This has been the backdrop for local negotiations.
 
While the union has had a couple of trainings with National Officers explaining what they believe the new language means.  Local Management is still trying to figure out their interpretation of the language.  This has resulted in interesting LMOU negotiations.  By the time you read this we should be close to finishing up the negotiations.
 As you all should be aware the USPS has a financial problem. 

This financial issue results in decision and proposals by Management that negatively impact our members.  This financial issue was created by Congress in 2006 and can only be fixed with Congressional approval.  After the results of the debt negotiations, the USPS saw an opening and have chose to use this financial situation to try and convince Congress to strip us of contractual rights that were recently negotiated.  This is such a blatant disregard to good faith negotiations.  It will poison the negotiations with the other unions.  There have been some flash bulletins sent out over the summer asking for your involvement in this issue.  I want to publically thank all those that have responded and if you have not please do so.  Your present quality of life is at stake in these issues.
 For the first time because of the ratified contract the APWU now represents non-career employees Postal Service Employee.  PSE are required to take the entrance exam and placed on a register for hiring.  The are to be hired from this register. 

The only way a person can be hired as a career employee is to go through the PSE process of hiring.  These are the future career employees of the Postal Service.  While we object that PSE are hired for the Plant because we have people still excessed with retreat rights.  Management still went through and hired them.  We are closely monitoring their usage and will aggressively pursue remedies where this is the case.   With this said, I would encourage you to welcome the PSE to your work area.  Most have already chosen to belong to the APWU which is great to see.
 Non-Traditional Full-Time Assignment are in the process of being developed.  There has been a great deal of disagreement with Management on this issue that has resulted in numerous grievances being filed.  This is just the tip of the iceberg.  We expect NTFT assignments staffing models to be presented in all area that we represent except Maintenance in the near future.  We will continue to work hard to represent our members issue in this area. There are so many other issues I could discuss. 

In closing, I believe the biggest battle we face is the one on Capital Hill.  Remember, Congress gave us the right to bargain collectively they can take it away.  This issue I can not deal with by myself, I need each and every one of you to find a way to get involved in the issue.  If this financial issue does not get resolved the Postal Service as we know it will go bankrupt and our collective bargaining will not matter. 
 

 

Horizontal Divider 1

From the June Postmark:

On May 11, the membership ratified the contract.  Our local had more than 60% of the members return their ballot and 84% voted in favor of ratification. We finished 6th in the nation of Locals greater than 1000 for members returning ballots.  As previously stated this contract has more changes than all the previous contracts combined.  On May 20th, the Officers and Stewards attended training on these changes in Minneapolis. This training will hopefully arm the stewards with knowledge to enforce the new agreement.         

The first order of business with the new contract is the issue of the Associate Offices.  The agreement has a global settlement concerning the amount of bargaining unit work that postmasters are allowed to perform.  In the past, we have used what is historical and customary in these offices as the benchmark.  This is no longer the case; we have several grievance cases that were put on hold pending this outcome.  The Clerk Craft Director, Bruce Gutzke is in the process of making sure these cases will be settled according to the global settlement.  Further, we know that there are many offices that we represent that have  a postmaster performing bargaining unit work in excess of the hours defined in this agreement.  At present we are developing a questionnaire that will be needed to process the grievances that are sure to follow.  
         

Presently they are still working at the National Level between the parties for an agreement on exactly what this means.  It is hoped in the next couple days that the National APWU provides us with this information.  We will then ensure that the Agreement is complied with for our members.  This Local is in the process requesting data from each AO that we represent to help determine where compliance is not being done. This Local will stand firm in representing our members for the Associate Offices. We will need the help of our members in these offices to bring the postmasters into compliance of this agreement.  If your postmaster is performing bargaining unit work we need you to contact the Union Office to ensure that we are looking into this possible violation.  Thanks in advance for your help in this issue.
         

This being the last Postmark for the summer, we will be in full swing of Local Negotiations before the next publication.  Please contact us if you believe that something needs to be changed in your local.  We have received some suggestions already.
        

 
Also, in May after the membership meeting we held an open house for our members to see their new Union Office.  I would like to thank Billie Dunn and Sue Helser for their help in organizing it.  It was a success we saw many members and a few retirees show up for this open house.  One other thank you goes to Steve Letendre for his work in getting the office ready for the meeting and open house.
       

  
Last, I would like to wish everyone a great summer.  We will be working hard over the summer months to prepare for Local Negotiations for the St. Paul Installation and the Associate Offices that need changes to their LMOU’s. 

Todd Elkerton

President   

Horizontal Divider 1

Hello Members,

 reprintedfrom the February Postmark

 

            Times have definitely been difficult, not only with home mortgages, health care, unemployment, etc; but also with the Postal Service and our jobs.  Who would have thought that employees would be excessed out of their home installation to unknown and not always preferred installations.  The St. Paul bid cluster has weathered through that storm, but now it is in front of us again at 5 of our Associate Offices.

 

            Notification of excessing out of the installation was sent to employees at the Cottage Grove, Stillwater, Northfield, Forest Lake, and Owatonna offices in August of 2010.  The original impact to these offices in total were 12 employees. After numerous days and hours of negotiations, the Union has successfully gotten that number down to 6.  (Zero was our goal, but management would not go there.)  The employees are now in the preferencing stage and the results will be out in mid-February.  These employees will preference, but movement to their new installation will not happen as there is a moratorium on excessing outside of the installation right now, as long as the National APWU and the Postal Service continue bargaining.  As of  1/28/2011, these negotiations are still in progress.

 

            Things at the new Eagan plant continue to be  a work in progress.  Meetings with management are being held weekly.  Not only are union issues discussed, so are any issues that are brought forward to the Union by our members.  If you, as a member, have any concerns that you would like to have brought forward at a Labor/Management meeting, please contact a steward or officer and your issues will be put on the agenda.

 

            I am pleased to announce that both the purchase agreements for the new building and the sale of the old building have been signed, and we are waiting for closing dates for both properties.  When dates become available, notice will be put out to the members, but hopefully everything will be complete in March and we will be able to hold our first General Membership Meeting in our new building in April.

 

Local elections are upon us again, and I urge all members to vote.

 

Dawn Ecker, President

Horizontal Divider 1

Hello Members,

 

Well, we made it through another holiday season, but this one was quite different than most others.  It was our first Christmas in the new Eagan plant, plus we had more snowfall this December than in recent years.  I hope everyone had enjoyable holidays.

 

We are now in the process once again of reviewing Function 4 staffing at all the stations and branches.  Management’s intent is to downsize stations again by getting rid of some duty assignments.  We will be doing everything we can do to avoid downsizing, but we need your help.  We need to be contacted for ALL violations, whether it be management performing our work, carriers performing our work, work not getting down, Sox compliance not being followed, carriers not being checked in, etc.  it is imperative that all violations do not go unnoticed.  Please request a steward when any and all violations occur.  Management believes that this downsizing could lead to out of the installation excessing once again.

 

There seem to be more and more issues concerning overtime.  I have had numerous complaints that the overtime is not fair, not equitable, etc.  the overtime provisions of the National Agreement and the Local’s overtime pecking order have not changed for many years.  The overtime is done on a rotating basis among the OTDL, quarterly, by seniority.  It is not always going to be fair and equitable.  Management calls the overtime, not the Union.  The Union should be receiving daily overtime consulations, to make sure the proper pecking order is used, and the proper employees are being drafted for overtime.

 

FMLA

 

The APWU is encouraging employees to use the Department of Labor FMLA forms.  Management has refused to accept the APWU FMLA forms, and the National APWU is pursuing a dispute with the Postal Service on this issue.

 

Update on the New Building

 

The final pre-construction meeting has taken place and the APWU is tentatively looking at a March 15 closing date for the new building.  We also are in the final stages of the sale on the property at 654 E 6th Street with Metro State University.  We are hoping for a March closing date as well for the sale of the property.

 

Mystery Shopper

After years of APWU complaints, the Postal Service has notified the union that the Mystery Shopper Program will be altered beginning in January 2011. Retail Associates (RAs) will no longer be required to follow a precise script when waiting on customers; instead they will be permitted to “customize their questions to best address individual customer needs.”

The questions have been a source of frustration, both to window clerks and the mailing public, in part because RAs were required to ask every customer mailing a package a litany of questions — even customers they knew well and whose needs they understood.

APWU Clerk Craft Director Rob Strunk praised the decision. “Finally, a manager with authority has realized that our Sales and Service Associates can determine on their own an appropriate method for communicating with our customers.

“The Mystery Shopper program has been misused, abused, and violated in so many ways,” he said. “We can go forward now demonstrating our professionalism.”

The Mystery Shopper program, which was recently renamed the Retail Customer Experience Program, has been a source of contention between the union and management since its inception. The program relies on management designees posing as customers and scoring retail clerks based on adherence to the script.

According to management’s Dec. 27, 2010, letter, the Product Offerings and Product Explanation categories will no longer be scored, and scoring in other categories will be revised.

Contract Negotiations

As of the writing of this article, the National APWU has stated that they are frustrated with the Postal Service and contract negotiations.  The National Agreement expired on November 20, 2010, but talks have continued.  For further updates, please visit the National APWU website.

Horizontal Divider 1

National Election

 

            The results of the National Election have been posted and I would like to welcome Marty Mater, the new Clerk Craft National Business Agent for our region.  Marty is from Madison, WI and was the Local President there.  Welcome Marty!

 

Excessing Update

 

            Minneapolis has received their impact statement on excessing out of the installation as follows: 66 Level 6 Clerks, 41 Level 7 clerks, 1 Level 8 clerk, and 6 TTO drivers.  Minneapolis has not yet received the impact statement for their maintenance craft.  What this means for St. Paul is that any residual positions in the Motor Vehicle Craft or Maintenance Craft in St. Paul would be withheld for the Minneapolis excessing.

 

CSBCS Removal

 

            We have received notice that the remaining CSBCS machines in the associate officers will be removed by November 30, 2010.  We have received the impact statements for these officers and will be meeting with management on these officers very soon.

 

New Union Building

 

            The Union has agreed to a purchase price for the new union office at the Waters Drive Business Park for $435.000.00.  We in the due diligence stage, then construction should begin soon.

 

Sale of the Old Building

 

            The Union has agreed to sell the property at 654 E 6th St to Metro State University for $575.000.00.  The paperwork is being prepared by our lawyer.

Horizontal Divider 1

Greetings!

 

            Well, the majority of the move to Eagan is complete and so is the reposting of the facility.  It has been chaotic, and probably will be for quite sometime.  The Union has been working diligently to attempt to resolve issues as they come about.  Some of these processes are new, and will take time to work out all the bugs.  If you have questions or want to address issues, please contact a steward or officer.

 

            Staffing is still going to be an ongoing issue, for all crafts.  The staffing package for Maintenance is improper, and a request to the National for a staffing advocate has been sent out in order to help correct this issue.  we have been notified that 5 of our Associate Officers will be excessing outside of their installation, and more offices will be looked at.  Stations and Branches will be reviewing their staffing once again, as they did last year.  And believe it or not, staffing will be looked at again at the Plant, very shortly.  I believe that because of the financial woes of the Postal Service the attempt to downsize employees will be become an everyday occurrence.  So it is very important that if management or another craft is performing your work, you take a stand and request to file a grievance.  This goes for all crafts in all offices.  We cannot protect staffing, if we do not protect the work that is ours.

 

            As reported in our National Postal Worker magazine, it is important to boycott USPS Employee Surveys.  The Postal Service is likely to use these results during contrct negotiations, to undercut the Union.  Management’s goal is to reduce wages and benefits in this upcoming contract.  Locally, we have quarterly VOE drawings for members who turn in the VOE surveys to the Union.  We need your continued support in boycotting employee surveys.

From the President

      Dawn Ecker

      Reprinted from the September 2010 Postmark.

 

Move to Eagan

 

            As I write this, we are in the process of the move to the new facility in Eagan.  Things have been hectic and crazy in this process, and have not gone as smoothly as projected.  If you have any questions or issues, please contact a steward or officer and we will attempt to have your concerns addressed with management.  The union office will hopefully be up and running by the time this paper reaches you.  Please bear with us in this process.

 

National Convention

 

            The National Convention was held in Detroit from August 20-28th, 2010.  As always, there was lively debate on many issues, as our current contract expires in November of 2010.  one of the issues of concern is our current FEHB. The delegates to the convention made it perfectly clear that they were not willing to make any deals with the current health care provided to USPS employees.

 

Out of the Installation Excessing

 

            The Union and Management continue to meet on the number of employees who are scheduled to be excessed out of the installation on 9/25/10.  as changes are made in the number of employees, management has sent out  recinsion letters to anyone who no longer needs to be excessed out of the installation.  We will continue to meet on this issue.

Horizontal Divider 1

APWU              St. Paul, MN Area Local                   APWU

September 16, 2010

 www.StPaulAPWU.org                             651-778-1637_

 

 

 

 

 

DUE TO

 

EXECUTIVE BOARD ACTION

 

DAWN ECKER

 

HAS BEEN ELECTED

 

PRESIDENT

 

AND WILL ASSUME THE POSITION OF PRESIDENT

 

EFFECTIVE

 

SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2010

 

 

 

Jesse Lopez

Secretary

St. Paul, MN Area Local

American Postal Workers Union

 

The Special Election to fill the office of President took place on June 23, 2010.  The Executive Board is required per the Local Constitution to obtain a 2/3 majority vote of those Executive Board Members present. 

 

The Executive Board was unable to reach a 2/3 majority vote. 

 

After consultation with the National Secretary/Treasurer’s office, it was determined that a 2/3 majority could not be reached and that Article 8, Section 2 of the Local Constitution would apply.  This Article states in part: “In the absence of the President, the Vice President shall be vested with the same powers as the President and shall perform all of the duties of the President including attendance at all State and National Conventions.”

 

Dawn Ecker

Acting President

Horizontal Divider 1

Hello Everyone (reprinted from the April Postmark)

            The information in this article was excerpted from the National’s Booklet “When Excessing Occurs, Know Your Rights and Benefits” to assist APWU members during a potentially difficult career experience.  Excessing is rarely easy.  A change in job assignment and/or relocation to a new community can be a terrible experience for the worker and the worker’s family.  But being excessed is certainly preferable to being laid off or terminated.

“When Excessing Occurs Know Your Rights and Benefits”

 GUARANTEED RIGHTS

Within the contractual protections of the National Agreement, postal employees enjoy specific guaranteed rights when excessing occurs. Five of these important rights are explained in this booklet. They are:

1. Rate Protection

2. Protected Rate

3. Discontinued Service Retirement Benefits and Rights

4. Severance Pay

5. Relocation Allowances

RATE PROTECTION

Article 4 of the National Agreement specifies that an employee whose job is eliminated as the result of technological or mechanization changes shall receive rate protection. The employee continues to receive the salary they received in the previous higher grade position until such time as they fail to bid or apply for a position in their former wage level. The salary protection provided by these provisions begins effective the date the affected employee is assigned to a residual lower level position or becomes the successful bidder to a lower level position. Any period as an unassigned employee following the elimination of a position due to technological/mechanization changes should be paid at the former level. This protected salary is augmented by any general salary increases occurring while the saved rate is in effect, including COLA and step increases. When it is intended to reduce the number of employees because of the deployment of automated equipment, local management must initiate an “automation impact statement” identifying the “impacted positions” and the number of positions to be reduced. Automation deployment may be in the affected office or in another office; it may result in the movement of mail or the processing of mail. Under both circumstances an “impact statement” is required. Employees receiving rate protection must bid or apply for all vacancies in their former wage level. Failure to bid or apply will result in forfeiture of the former wage level. This requirement to bid or apply includes only those posted vacancies for which the employee is eligible to bid or apply. While receiving rate protection, employees may bid for vacancies at a level other than their former level without jeopardizing their rate protection.

Protected Rate

The Employee and Labor Relations Manual (421.51) specifies that employees whose jobs are eliminated for reasons other than technological or mechanization changes and who are assigned to vacancies in a lower level shall receive a “protected rate.” Such employee will continue to receive the salary of the previous higher level position, augmented by any general wage increase, for a period of two years, provided that:

a. The employee served for two consecutive years immediately preceding the effective date of reduction in a position with a salary standing higher than that to which reduced.

b. The reduction is involuntary. Employee bids occurring after reassignment do not invalidate the protection.

c. The employee occupied a permanent higher level position and their performance was satisfactory during the previous two years. Clerk Craft employees assigned to lower level receive “rate protection” under all circumstances and continue to receive the salary of their former level, provided they fulfill the requirement to bid and apply for vacancies in their former level.

RATE DETERMINATION

The basic salary of an employee entitled to a protected rate will be the lowest of the following:

a. The employee’s basic salary at the time of reduction.

b. An amount which is 25 percent more than the maximum basic salary for the new grade to which reduced.

c. The basic salary in the lowest salary standing which the employee held during the two years immediately preceding reduction in salary standing, augmented by each step increase the employee would have earned in the previous level.

DISCONTINUED SERVICE RETIREMENT

Title 5 USCS and the ELM (563.21) specify that any career USPS employee (CSRS or FERS) meeting retirement eligibility requirements who is involuntarily separated and who has been employed continuously by the USPS and/or other federal agency for at least 12 consecutive months (without a break in service of three or more consecutive days immediately prior to the separation) is eligible for discontinued service retirement, except in the following circumstances:

The employee is not entitled to an immediate retirement annuity if:

a. At the time of separation the employee is offered and declines to accept a position in the USPS or in any other federal agency of like seniority, tenure, and pay within the same commuting area.

“Commuting area” means the geographic area that usually constitutes one area for employment purposes. It includes any population center (or two or more neighboring ones) and the surrounding localities in which people live and reasonably can be expected to travel back and forth daily in their usual employment.

b. The employee is separated because of entry in the military service.

c. The employee is separated for cause on charges of misconduct, delinquency, or inefficiency.

d. The employee at the time of separation is receiving compensation as a beneficiary of the Federal Employees Compensation Act, except when receiving this compensation concurrently with postal pay.

For the purpose of this regulation, “separation” means excessed or reassigned from an assignment without a comparable offer.

 

SEVERANCE PAY         

Title 5 USCS (§5595) and ELM 435 specify that any career USPS employee (CSRS or FERS) who is

involuntarily separated and who has been employed continuously by the USPS and/or other federal agency for at least 12 consecutive months (without a break in service of three or more consecutive days immediately prior to the separation) is eligible for severance pay, except in the following circumstances:

a. The employee is entitled to an immediate retirement annuity including discontinued service retirement.

b. At the time of separation, the employee is offered and declines to accept a position in the USPS of like seniority, tenure, and pay within the same commuting area.

c. The employee is separated for cause on charges of misconduct, delinquency, or inefficiency.

d. The employee, at the time of separation, is receiving compensation as a beneficiary of the Federal Employees Compensation Act, except when receiving this compensation concurrently with postal pay.

RELOCATION ALLOWANCES

The F-12 Handbook specifies that employees who are involuntarily excessed and required to report to another installation are entitled to a relocation allowance, provided the new duty station is at east 50 miles greater in distance than the distance between their former duty station and their former residence. When notified that you will be involuntarily excessed to a location more than 50 miles further than the distance between your present home and your duty station, you should request a written statement ordering your reassignment. A computer- driven notice of reassignment or PS Form 178 will suffice as official notice. You should not volunteer to accept the new assignment. If you volunteer for reassignment, under most circumstances you are not eligible for relocation allowances: After being notified that you are excess, you are provided choices of locations from which you make a selection, and your reassignment continues to be involuntary and is covered by the relocation expense regulations. In those instances when a senior employee volunteers to be excessed in lieu of a junior employee, the senior employee should notify management that excessing is still occurring and should be considered “involuntary” for purposes of relocation expenses. Where management refuses to authorize relocation expenses, the employee may elect to either refuse to volunteer or write a letter to management notifying that the relocation is not considered voluntary by the employee and that a grievance will be filed contesting the decision to refuse payment of the allowance. To prevent any misunderstandings over your entitlement, you should insist that your reassignment order be in writing. When provided options of different postal installations to which you may be excessed, you should always indicate-by letter-that your selection does not represent your volunteering for reassignment. Do not accept a management offer to voluntarily transfer because excessing is imminent or the offered position is more convenient.

 

These are just some of the regulations intended to help you make an informed decision if you are an impacted or volunteer employee. There is a link to the full booklet on the Local’s website on the “Helpful Links” page.  Please feel free to contact a union representative for any other questions or concerns you may have.

 

.

 

Hello Everyone,

 

          Well, it has been a very hectic 11 months since I have taken office.  The local and its membership have had to endure station downsizing (right sizing as management likes to call it), sectional excessing, bid restructuring, the upcoming move to the new St. Paul P&DC, very limited vacancy notices and the granddaddy of them all, the likelihood of excessing outside of the installation.  As we move (d) through these processes, many of you have expressed their concern(s) about their future with the postal service, whether it be senior employees or junior employees, it is evident everyone is concerned.  I would like to assure everyone that the union is meeting with management at every level to minimize the disruption to one’s life and family.  For the record the union has been meeting with management weekly, while in reality the meetings have turned daily.  However, it is unfortunate that it appears too many of you feel that the union is not being forthright with information.  I assure you that as the union becomes aware of management's proposed numbers and is able to garner relevant information that it will and is forwarded on to you, the members.

 

          You the members have been made aware of management’s proposed numbers for excessing outside of the installation, which is 128 clerks, 106 level 6 and 22 level 7.  As for clerks bid and employees retire or transfer this overall number will change, which could impact one’s position on the excessing list.  So as I have stated in the past, everything is fluid at this point and will remain that way for some time to come. 

 

Bear in mind that excessing is a management decision.  The agreement between the parties establishes specific guidelines to be followed when excessing occurs. The general principle is that inconvenience and disruption is to be kept to a minimum.  It is a difficult and stressful time for everyone involved especially the employees indentified as excess to the needs of a section or installation.

 

Often excessive OT and ongoing changes to full time regular schedules, cross craft work and supervisors doing bargaining unit work follows excessing action.  This happens because management excesses too many employees and now finds they are short staffed.  If you are party to or witness any violations, please contact a union steward and file a grievance. 

 

On 2/25/10 the union was invited to a district labor management meeting at the new NDC (formerly the BMC) at this meeting we were informed that the commercial mailing industry intends on eliminating all first class mailings.  The Postal Service projects that this action will delay the financial recovery through the year 2020.  The Service projects annual losses will be around 10 billion dollars a year for the next ten years. 

 

Also, we were able to tour the new St. Paul P&DC.  The building is currently empty.  The only equipment inside is the trayveyor.  Completion is scheduled for sometime between August and November 2010.  As you can read there is a lot happening. 

 

Thank you to all the members, stewards and officers for their dedication in these trying and testing times. 

Horizontal Divider 1

Hello Everyone, (reprinted from February 2010 Postmark)

 

          Due to the intense and urgent nature of the requests for the details of the new facility staffing package, I will provide the following information on the staffing package, instead of my normally formatted article.

 

Pay Location

Staffing Impact

110

No change

120

Reduction of one level 6 position

125

Addition of two level 6 positions

129

No change to level 7, reduction of four level 6 positions

131

Posting two level 6 positions per grievance

145

Reduction of 14 level 6 positions

FSS T-1

New section, addition of 6 level 6 positions

210 (REG)

Reduction of one level 7 position

210 (BOX)

Reduction of three level 6 positions

225

No change

229

 No change to level 7, reduction of two level 6 positions

231

Reduction of 18 level 6 positions

245

Reduction of 9 level 6 positions

310 (BOX)

Reduction of 1 level 6 and 1 level 7 position

310 (REG)

Reduction of 1 level 6 position

325

Reduction of 9 level 6 positions

329

Reduction of 4 level 6 positions and an addition of 1 level 7 position

331

Reduction of 6 level 6 positions

345

Reduction of 9 level 6 positions

FSS T-3

New section, addition of 6 level 6 positions

AMC T-1

Reduction of 6 level 7 positions and an addition of two level 6 positions

AMC T-2

Reduction of 5 level 6 positions and a reduction of four level 7 positions

AMC T-3

Reduction of 6 level 6 positions and a reduction of 8 level 7 positions

                            

 

Management has notified the local that as of 12/24/09, 106 level 6 and 22 level 7 Clerk employees will be excessed from the installation. Junior employees to be excessed will be excessed by craft, salary level and status. Best Qualified, and part time regulars are a separate status.  When excessing occurs the sole criteria for selecting employees to be excessed is craft seniority.  Whether you are recovering from either on or off the job injury would have no bearing on being excessed.  Employees in a light or limited duty status will be excessed in the same way that employees in a full duty status are excessed, based on the pay level of the duty assignment that they hold and their seniority.

 

          So far, it has not been determined how the move from the old (St. Paul) installation to the new (Eagan) installation will be completed.  Management has notified the union that their plan is to move operations to the new facility in stages, over a 1 to 3 month period beginning possibly in June or July of this year.

 

          As far as bidding in the new facility, it will depend on how and when management abolishes, reverts, excesses and posts bid duty assignments.  As of now, it is impossible to determine what jobs will be posted installation wide or posted for in-section bidding. 

 

The Local still has not received the maintenance staffing package.

         

We will continue to meet regularly with management.  We will keep you informed as details become available.

 

 

Horizontal Divider 16

Hello Everyone

 

          Well, another year has come and gone and still we are no closer to knowing what the staffing of the new facility will look like.  Management has been telling your local officers that they really do want to provide us with “the numbers”. Yet every time we ask for the staffing package we get the same old song and dance, the “event” package has been sent to the area (Dan Foster, Labor Relations), who in turn will send it to the APWU (Sharon Stone, Regional Coordinator) who then ultimately will provide it to the local.   The bottom line is that management has not provided the staffing for the new facility to the Region/Local because they know that there is going to be a major impact the bargaining unit. And I believe that management also knows that you, the employees, will have something to say about the impacts.  Bear in mind, the contract provides for a response in February.  Unfortunately, without this information many of you cannot make an informed decision as to bid or not to bid, whether to begin training on a station bid, or ride the storm out.  Whatever the final outcome for staffing of the new facility is, you will be notified immediately.  This last year has been full of turmoil, more than I have ever witnessed in my postal career with downsizing the plant, stations and AO’s reverting almost every position that becomes vacant, and the constant threat of excessing outside of the installation.  Yet your Local/National officers have been diligent in their efforts to ensure your contractual rights are not being trampled and that management adheres to the agreement it too witnessed.  These times have been stressful for all. I would like to say thank you to the membership for your continued support of your local and to all the stewards and officers for a job well done.  May the New Year bring peace, health and prosperity to everyone!

 

Tom Edwards

Hello Everyone, (reprinted from the November 2009 Postmark)

          Your union has been hard at work fending off management’s attacks.  To date, your union has been able to stop the closure of several Postal Facilities, decrease the number of abolishments and hold off the excessing of any employees outside of the installation. This is in no way of mean that management will end their assault on craft employees.  In fact, I believe that management is just getting started.  The future looks bleak for craft employees; all that I ask is that management share the pain.  We were informed that management implemented a program known as RIF (Reduction in Force). This is the service’s program for cutting cost in the management ranks, and as far as I can see or am aware of, there has not been one SDO, MDO or any other EAS position affected in St. Paul by this program.  It appears to me that this program is similar, if not the exact same as the restructuring of the early 1990’s.  Many of us have been around long enough to remember this, and all that happened of this program was that EAS employees had their titles changed or received promotions.  Remember all of this is happening in the name of declining mail volume and revenue.  We all need to make sacrifices, that’s what the executives say whenever a company hits hard times, but yet they don’t want to share the excess when times are good.  They always look to the crafts to bear the burden.  Here are a few facts:

 

  • Since 2000 the USPS has eliminated over 150,000 craft jobs, which is a reduction of almost 23% of the bargaining unit workforce.
  • Through July 2009 the USPS has eliminated approximately 80 million craft work hours.  Roughly 39,000 craft positions.
  • PMG Potter is proposing a shift to a five day delivery which would eliminate 17% of all city carrier hours.  This may mean elimination of 34,000 full time regular positions.
  • The USPS plans to eliminate another 90 million or so hours in 2010.  that’s approximately  43,000 more positions gone.

And let’s not forget the coup d’etat, the implementation of the National Reassessment Process, which is designed to force many of the injured workers out of the USPS.  So, if all of these strategies go as planned, it could equate to the reduction or elimination of over 300,000 craft jobs.  So from 2000-2010, that would result in a reduction of almost 50% of all bargaining unit positions.  Let’s see how many EAS positions will be affected. Remember, we all need to sacrifice.

 

Respectfully and in solidarity,

 

Tom Edwards, President

 

 

Hello Everyone,

 

          Heads Up…

 

          Well it has begun.  Management has started to implement their national reassessment program (NRP).  This program affects all limited duty employees.  The first meeting of this program will take place 10/7/09.  the following is reprinted from the 10/18/09 flash bulletin:

 

“Postal Service Now Targets ALL Limited Duty Employees for Its National Reassessment Program

 

In October 2008, the St. Paul Area Local was informed that the Northland District will be entering into Phase 2 of the National Reassessment Program for MMI employees. This program is designed to develop limited duty employees with permanent medical restrictions resulting from a work related injury rehabilitation job offers.   At this point Phase 2 has been in place for 10 months with no meeting being scheduled with employees.  The APWU has just been informed that the USPS has developed a companion process that will target all limited duty employees.  This process is not intended to replace the first program but run in tandem with the new program.  This will mean that the limited duty employees who have reached MMI will be subjected to both processes.

 

Postal Service’s National Reassessment Process – Limited Duty

 

On May 29, 2009 the USPS concluded its NPR-LD pilot program.  The APWU has been informed that the USPS plans to implement this program nationwide starting July 13, 2009 with “work status meetings” beginning no sooner than July 27, 2009. the National APWU has raised significant concerns about the process and its compliance with existing law and the USPS manuals.  The National APWU has met with the Department of Labor DFEC concerning what It sees as clear violation of the law and procedures developed by OWCP.  As of yet, there have been very few answers provided.

 

Therefore, the St. Paul APWU is asking all limited duty employees when contacted by USPS Management concerning their work status to immediately ask for a Union Steward to ensure that all rights are being asserted from the beginning of the process.

 

The St. Paul Area Local expects this new process to negatively impact our injured workers.  To illustrate how many employees can be expected to be impacted we are sharing the statistics that were provided to the APWU concerning the pilot program for this new process.  There were 2230 employees who were reassessed as part of the two and a half month pilot period.  Only 41% (912) of these employees received “full day” job offers, just 30% (667) were assigned “partial day” work (even though they were medically able to work more hours), and a devastating 29% (651) were told that there was not work available. “

 

 

All Craft Conference

 

          On 9/29/09 a delegation of 7 officers and I attended the all craft conference in Las Vegas.  In attendance were approximately 2000 members of the clerk, maintenance and motor vehicle crafts, as well as support services.  During the conference the delegation was addressed by many of the resident officers from Washington DC, including President Burrus.  President Burrus began his address by calling the union’s current circumstances the “best of times, and the worst of times.”  Burrus outlined an ambitious agenda for the union’s future.  Burrus urged the conference participants to meet the challenges that lay ahead.  From the Postal Services financial crisis to the upcoming contract negotiations and the shrinking workforce.  President Burrus asked members to draw strength from the union’s many achievements and to refocus their efforts to the tasks that lay ahead.

 

Achievements

 

          Many of us are experiencing the worst recession in 70 years, but yet we are largely unscathed from the turmoil millions of American workers are facing.  Garnering at least one level upgrades for every employee, negotiating retirement and separation incentives for our members and others, helped to elect a president who represents all that is good in our country and helped with the passage of House Resolution 22 (pre-funded retirees health care).  These are some of the achievements that have been obtained during my years as a member and officer of the APWU, and there are many more.  Although it may be difficult to maintain these achievements in the coming years, it is our opportunity to relish these accomplishments.

 

Challenges

 

          We are experiencing unprecedented excessing and reassignments, P&DC consolidations, station and branch closings, contracting out our work, congressional interference as related to the collective bargaining process, national reassignment program, under staffing, declining mail volume and management performing more and more bargaining unit work.  Of course, these are not all of the challenges we face, there are many more.

 

          We must remain vigilant in these times. The future of the APWU rests with us.  Longtime President Moe Biller frequently closed his articles with the saying “The struggle continues” and as you can see, it truly does.

 

Respectfully and in solidarity,

 

Tom Edwards, President

Horizontal Divider 1

Democracy Does Work! It’s up to you to do your part! - from the September 2009 Postmark

 

          Please contact your congressional representatives and urge them to support the following bills.  Action is needed by all APWU members to help ensure the Postal Service’s financial viability and business viability.  Your involvement will also help protect and strengthen postal workers’ financial viability into retirement. Your representatives’ contact information is provided below.

 

 

HR 658 “Access to Postal Services Act”

 

          This bill would modify the procedure the US Postal Service has to follow before it can consolidate or close postal facilities to require an assessment of the need to close/consolidate, require 90 days notice to each facility, allow for appeals of the closing to the Postal Rate Commission and eliminate any economic reason for closing.

 

HR 22 “United States Postal Service Financial Relief Act of 2009”

 

          This bill would eliminate the requirement that the Postal Service “pre-fund” its annuities for retirees saving approximately five billion dollars per year.

 

HR 168 “Mail Network Protection Act of 2009”

 

          Legislation would require the postal service to enter into negotiations with postal unions prior to subcontracting mail processing to the private sector.

 

HR 235 “Social Security Fairness Act of 2009”

 

          Would repeal the windfall elimination provision and the government pension offset rules that unfairly limit social security payments to civil service retirees.

 

HR 1409 and S 560 “Employee Free Choice Act of 2009”

 

          Modifies and loosens many of the national labor relations board requirements for employees in a business to form a union.  It makes it easier for employees to unionize their workplace.

 

HR 958     To amend title 5, United States Code, to make unused sick leave creditable, for purposes of the Federal Employees' Retirement System, in the same manner as provided for under the Civil Service Retirement System.

 

          This bill would allow government employees under Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) to have unused sick leave in full month increments credited toward their seniority for retirement pension computations.

 

          These are some but not all of the issues currently affecting Postal Workers both active and retired.  Please take the time to contact your representatives.  The job you save and the life you change by your actions may be your own.

 

Respectfully and in solidarity

 

Tom Edwards, President

 

Horizontal Divider 1

Hello Everyone,

 

          As I sit and write this article, management is continuing their assault on postal employees. Most of you are aware that we are in a continuous and ongoing battle over the decimation of our jobs.  Management has waged a tour compression campaign which affects some of our most senior and junior employees via loss of days off, list of tour, closing of facilities, combining of facilities, excessing, without etc., etc.  Now I understand their reasoning, mail volumes are down, which in turn decreases revenue, which in turn requires adjustments to the work force and business practices.  But for the life of me, I cannot understand how shifting the workforce to tour three and tour one will decrease the service’s expenditures.  In fact, it will result in increased night differential and increased Sunday premium pay for a greater number of employees resulting in an increased bottom line for the service.

 

          The following is a response from National President Bill Burrus to John Dirzius, President of the National President’s Conference:

 

          “Thank you for your inquiry.  Below is an update on national issues regarding the USPS policy of “Tour Compression”.  The national union filed an unfair labor practice change with the National Labor Relations Board on 11/25/08, contesting management’s refusal to negotiate with the union prior to initiating the change.  The charge is pending a decision by the NLRB.  The ULP alleges that management failed to bargain over the nation wide plan to consolidate mail processing into two tours – a plan that would eliminate or greatly reduce the number of assignments on tour 2.  The charge also asserts that the Postal Service failed to provide information to the union regarding this initiative; in addition, the charge says the APWU could “show that the Postal Service answered the Union’s request for information dishonestly.”  When the APWU requested documentation detailing the program in October 2008, management denied that it was “considering or is in the process of implementing a nationwide program establishing a two tour operation, which is intended to eliminate or greatly reduce tour 2 assignments, operations, and staffing.”  The Postal Service also wrote, regarding your request to produce documentation regarding any nationwide or region or district wide program, plans or initiatives to eliminate or reduce tour 2 operations and/or tour 2 staffing, no such documentation exists.”  The APWU requested immediate injunctive relief, asserting that without such relief the initiative would be completed before the board would be able to address the charge.

 

          The union also initiated two step 4 grievances on December 16, 2008, contesting the program. The first, HQTG200819, challenged management’s authority to initiate the changes without providing the union the required 90 days advance notice at the national level and the required 6 month advance notice at the regional level.  I discussed this grievance with management’s representative on January 30, 2009 and have promised a written proposal for resolution during the week of 3/30/09.  Upon receipt of the management’s proposal, I will either pursue a final resolution of the issue or initiate an appeal to arbitration.  The objective of the grievance is to clarify that the USPS union and APWU at the national level agree that Article 12.5.5B.4 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement requires management to notify the union up to 6 months in advance whenever possible before the Postal Service undertakes reassignments such as the tour compression.”  Our goal is to reach agreement that no “interpretive issue” is involved in the reassignment of employees; if agreement can be reached on this principle, disputes will be refer to the local parties to determine if it was possible for management to provide the required notice prior to reassigning employees.

 

          The second step 4 dispute, HQTG200820, focuses on management’s violation of Article 17.5.B.4, which requires the Postal Service to discus new initiatives with eh union during the development stage, and to bargain in good faith.  The APWU learned of management’s plan from local union officials and did receive notification of the plan from the Postal Service until after the ULP and step 4 disputes were filed.  The dispute also asserts that the USPS failed and refused to provide the APWU with relevant information requested by the union.  In response to a written request for documentation regarding any “nationwide or region or district-wide program, plans or initiatives to eliminate or reduce tour 2 operations and/or staffing”, the Postal Service informed the APWU that “no such documentation exists.”  However, evidence shows that the two tour initiative is, in fact, nationwide in scope and that it was initiated by the Postal Service at the national level. The Step 4 also asserts that the plan violates the parties “commitment to protect day shift assignments.  Management’s actions violate Article 7.1.B.4 and the Memorandum of Understanding regarding the Supplemental Workforce and the conversion of Clerk Craft Part Time Flexibles.  The protection of existing tour 2 assignments was central to the historic agreement reached in 2006 contract negotiations.  Industrial Relations Director Greg Bell met with a USPS representative to discuss this grievance on 1/21/09, Fifteen day statements of the issues and facts involved in the dispute were exchanged on 2/13/09, and the dispute was appealed to arbitration on 2/17/09.

 

          This is what is being done at the National Level; locally we are utilizing every tool available to us to minimize the impact to our membership.

President Tom Edwards

Hello Everyone,

 

 

          I would like to take this time to write about House Resolution 22.  this resolution is very important to all of us as postal workers.  What is the APWU’s role in helping get legislative relief from the USPS payment for pre-funding retiree’s health insurance – 58 billion over 10 years?

 

          As many of you are aware, the survival of the Postal Service is not guarantee.  Now, some people will argue that the Postal Service is  Constitutionally protected and that it is not a business to be operated for profit, but in fact, it is a service that is rendered for profit or loss. Regardless of my stance on this debate, there is one thing for sure I am convinced of.  Congress is busy bailing out the financial fat cats, the automobile industry and the like, but a public service that touches virtually every American citizen here and abroad is left unaided.  The service we provide is a necessity for many Americans and should be at the top of any economic relief package considered by Congress. 

 

          HR-11, a bill introduced January 6, 2009, requires government contributions for health benefits for an individual who first becomes an annuitant by reason of retirement from employment with the United States Postal Service on or after July 1, 1971, or for their survivor or for a survivor of an employee who died on or after that date while employed by the Service.  Payment is first made by the Service’s retiree benefits fund up to the amount deposited in the fund with any remaining amount to be paid by the Service.  (current law requires contributions  be paid by the Service through September 30, 2016).

          I ask and urge all of you to contact your representatives and senators and ask them to support this bill.  We all have an interest in the Service’s sound financial future, the Service’s future is our future.

 

 

THANK YOU

 

            Tom Edwards, President

           

            I would like to say thank you to all who voted for and supported me for the office of the President.  I look forward to the challenges of administering to this great Local.  I realize there are many issues confronting us as an organization, past, present and in the future.  I look forward to working with the members and all the duly elected officers and stewards.  Together we will make a great team.

            In closing I would like to say thank you to Pat McCann for his dedication and ongoing fight for our members and the union movement.

 

 

Horizontal Divider 1

Articles from Past President McCann:
 

Regional Excessing Meeting Produces Little Agreement

                   Pat McCann

          On Thursday, Feb. 26, 2009, the Union met with management regarding the notification to excess 43 employees from the St. Paul, MN installation.

          Attending the meeting were USPS representatives from Headquarters and the Western Area.  Attending for the APWU was Central Region Coordinator Sharyn Stone, National Business Agent Central Region Willie Mellen, along with me and Vice President Dawn Ecker.

          This meeting was supposed to occur prior to the information received on 1/6/09 but in typical management fashion, it was done ass backwards.  This resulted in some heated exchanges involving the inaccurate information that management presented to the Union on the day of the meeting.

          Further complicating matters was the information provided appeared to be gathered and assembled the day before so those management reps presenting the information where less than knowledgeable on the material they were presenting, which led to an unproductive meeting.

          From the Union’s perspective, the information provided at the meeting was inaccurate and does not support a need to excess employees from the St. Paul installation.  We did agree at the meeting that if management provides accurate information that supports the need to excess and complies with Article 12 of the Contract that excessing will occur no sooner than July 2009.

          Since this process adjusts every time there is attrition in the bargaining unit, the parties have agreed to meet at the local level to adjust the number of employees to be excessed.

          Since the initial notification to excess 43 employees was received in January 2009, management has adjusted the number to 35 employees.  The union believes that this number is not supported by accurate information. From the data we have it appears at this point in time we’re at 10 employees to be excessed and that number will be further reduced as we get closer to July 2009.

          This is going to be a long, drawn out process, so please bear with us as we work to protect your rights under the contract.  I will update you via bulletins as we move through the process.

A Goal Set, A Goal Met

          By Pat McCann

          The St. Paul, MN Area Local has again risen to the challenge to raise money for our Committee on Political Action (COPA).  For the calendar year 2008 members of the St. Paul Local contributed a total of $12,303.22 to COPA.  This is an increase over year 2007’s donations in the amount of $1400.74.

           We met and exceeded our goal by raising $12,303.22.

          In 2008 we increased those contributing bi-weekly from 76 members to 83 members.  We also saw an increase in overall donators from 145 members in 2007 to 154 members contributing to COPA in 2008.

          What do all these numbers mean?  Since COPA began, we have seen our members become increasingly more involved in our Political Action Committee.  We’ve seen a steady increase of the years of members contributing bi-weekly and annually.  Also there has been more involvement during elections with phone banking and door knocking.

          This all points to the fact that you, the members, are stepping up to the plate and recognizing the importance of political involvement.

          The next couple of years are going to be challenging to the USPS with mail volume failing because of the faltering economy, the USPS will faced with decisions that if implemented (eliminating 6 day delivery, consolidating processing plants, closing post offices, funding retiree healthcare, etc) will have devastating effects on our members.  The USPS can take these actions in most cases without violating our Collective Bargaining Agreement.

          One of the avenues in which we can have our voices heard on these issues is through our Congressional Representatives. COPA provides President Burrus and our Legislative Director Myke Reid along with Assistant Legislative Director Steve Albanese the opportunity to access members of Congress from both sides of the aisle that will influence a good majority of the decisions the USPS will make in the coming months.

          On a broader scale, the Labor Movement is constantly under attack by corporations attempting to introduce legislation to erode workers’ ability to bargain on behalf of their members.  Hopefully with the change that occurred in the last election cycle, we will be able to spend less time defeating onerous legislation put forward by corporations and actually enact legislation that improves the lives of the working class.

          This can only be accomplished by being involved in politics on Capitol Hill.  Involvement is made possible through COPA.

          I would like to thank those who contributed to COPA in 2008.  I would also like to thank Bruce Gutzke, COPA Coordinator for his tireless work.  Great job Bruce!

          Lastly, I hope that those who supported COPA in 2008 will continue to do so in 2009. for those who missed the opportunity to contribute in 2008, I challenge you to help us reach our goal of $12,500.00 in 2009 so that we continue to have a healthy political action fund, allowing our voices to be collectively heard on Capitol Hill.

Horizontal Divider 1

Changes, Changes and More Changes

          Pat McCann

 

          As we begin the new year, we leave behind a year that was full of change to our working environment.

          We experienced a reduction in staffing at our stations and branches, along with reposting of bids and changing start times/days off.   The plant saw the final phase of decentralization take place in city division and the elimination of one FSM 1000, causing abolishments on tour 1 and tour 3.

          Motor vehicle experienced run adjustments and the potential loss of 5 positions through attrition.

          The maintenance craft seemed to fair better when it came to change.  We actually saw an increase in our custodial occupational group with a number of employees transferring into the management craft from the clerk craft and the mailhandler craft.

          As we begin the new year, we are faced with the tour 2 compression initiative.  Initially this is going to affect the clerk craft in letter automation on all three tours with abolishments and reposting of duty assignments and start time changes.  Eventually this could spread to the flat operation at a later date.

          The tour 2 compression will also affect motor vehicle craft employees with an adjustment to their runs to stations and branches.

          Maintenance staffing and start times for employees who work on the machines may at some point see adjustments based on the tour 2 compression initiative

          For the clerks and motor vehicle employees, their changes will start in January 2009 and be completed in February 2009.

          The registry section was also a target for management to reduce work hours.  Management will be abolishing two (2) positions on tour 3 and reposting another.

          At the Air Mail Center, management will be abolishing 2 ramp clerk positions and will revert one open position.

          This spring the Mail Recovery Center is slated to be closed with the work being moved to the Atlanta mail recovery center.  This will affect approximately 50 clerks.

          So the first four (4) months of 2009 will be extremely unsettling for our members.

          On the positive side, through all this change, no employee has been excessed from the installation and forced to move in order to continue employment with the Post Office.  This has not been the case in numerous installations across the country where employees have had to relocate in order to keep their employment with the Postal Service.

          After these changes take place in early 2009, I think we will experience a brief period of stability. I say this because I believe that in fall of 2009 the decrease in mail volume will start to level off.  Our ratio between the number of duty assignments (bids) versus employees will be virtually equal, thus requiring management to be much more thoughtful in managing duty assignments in each section because of the requirement to have equal number of bids for employees. This coupled with economists predicting that the economy will start showing signs of recovery in late 2009. That said, the move to Eagan in late 2010, early 2011 has the potential for serious disruption to our work environment depending on what the USPS categorizes the new building as will determine the level of disruption.  

          On the bright side, employment with the USPS even with rough economic times continues to be stable employment.

Horizontal Divider 1

DESTRUCTION OF TOUR 2 PICKS UP SPEED

          by Pat McCann

          In the past three weeks, we have been notified by management that they intend on moving Tour 2 Letter Automation to a 12:05 p.m. start time and eliminating the Mail Recovery Center in St. Paul which is a Tour 2 operation.  Furthermore, there is rumbling that Tour 2 Flat operations may suffer the same fate in the near future.

          Through correspondence with other APWU Presidents around the country, they report that their processing plants are suffering the same fate.  This indicates that this is USPS Headquarters’ driven initiative.  Therefore, APWU Presidents from around the country have requested that President Burrus assist us in dealing with this issue.  A teleconference has been set for December 3, 2008 to discuss the issues.

          I don’t believe this is something that is going to be solved through the grievance procedure because it does not appear to be a Contract violation.  I believe a dialogue has to take place with those at USPS Headquarters who have made these decisions and they appear to have been made at the highest levels of the USPS.  I say this because we have tried locally to open dialogue with the Plant Manager on these changes to no avail.  The Plant Manager had indicated he does not have a choice in these matters.

 

MOVE TO EAGAN UPDATE

          Excavating contractors have begun prepping the site for construction of the new building.  The completion date of the new facility is late 2010, early 2011.  We will probably begin meetings on the move mid-season of 2009.  We will keep you informed in the move through the process.

         

Horizontal Divider 1

THE ELECTION IS OVER – NOW WHAT?

            by Pat McCann

            The answer is, let’s hold our elected representatives accountable!

            All too often after Election Day, we go back to our daily activities and assume that our elected representatives will fight for the interests of the working class/middle class/main street America, for which we elected them, but more often than not, we get ignored in the process because we ignore the process.  This has to change.  We must stay active in the process.

            If you believe for one moment that the lobbyist who advocated for legislation that has severely and negatively impacted the working class/middle class/ main street America are going to stand down because we have changed the playing field where the game is played, you are mistaken.  They are going to fight tooth and toenail to keep in place every piece of legislation that has been passed that has put us in the position we are in today.

            If we don’t put as much effort into lobbying our representatives for the changes we elected them to make as we did in getting them elected, then we will have squandered a once in our lifetime chance to make a positive difference for organized labor, working class America and main street America.

            So, on January 20, 2009, let’s be ready to participate in the process and make positive changes for the working people of America.  If we let this opportunity slip by, shame on us.

Members, we have reached a point in our postal careers where the election on November 4, 2008 will more than likely determine the direction of our employment with the United States Postal Service.

The Postal Service is caught in what I would call the perfect storm that could lead to privatization without intervention from Congress and the next President.

The storm began with the introduction of the internet and the avenues it provided for people to connect with each other electronically. Since the invention of the internet, first class mail volume, which was the bread and butter of the Postal Service, has continued to decrease at record rates.  Initially standard mail volume was off-setting the decrease in first class mail volume, but now the Postal Service is experiencing volume reductions in standard mail.

The storm continued to pick up strength with the introduction of postal reform by the Bush Administration, passed by a Republican Controlled House and Senate, a law that severely hamstrings the Post Office’s ability to navigate through an economy that is in recession.

Under the law, the only means for the USPS to recover losses due to the economy:

 

·        Significant productivity improvement (nothing significant on the horizon in technology that will change productivity)

·        Invoking the law’s exigency clause (increasing postage rates above the rate of inflation, it permits such increase in extraordinary or exceptional circumstances). Invoking this would most likely drive down mail volume.

 

The final piece of the perfect storm is the economic recession.  Companies that use the Postal Service to distribute their advertising have begun to cut back and we are seeing a dramatic decrease in standard mail volumes (flats and letters).  This, coupled with the price of gas having risen to $3.50 a gallon, equates to the Postal Service losing 2.3 billion dollars this year, and a projected loss of 2 billion in Fiscal Year 2009.

If the economy continues on its current path, and it most likely will for at least at minimum another year, the Postal Service will continue to run a deficit.  So the Postal Service is basically left with 4 options:

 

1.                           Reduce operating expenses by reducing the number one operating expense, “employees”.  This will speed up the march to privatization.

2.                           Raise the rates under the law to match inflation.  Raising rates sharply will force major mailers to sharply reduce or abandon hard copy communication in favor of alternatives, furthering the call for privatization.

3.                           Increase mail volume. This is not likely to happen during an economic recession.

4.                           Use its authority under the law to borrow up to 15 billion dollars to continue operating.  Borrowing money will increase the drumbeat for privatization.

 

The outlook for employees of the United States Postal Service is bleak, but all is not lost.

Before private companies are allowed to pick apart the Post Office, the 800 pound gorilla (the President and Congress) will weigh in on the future role of government in providing postal service to the nation.

This is where we, as postal employees and voters, can make a game changing move by electing a President, a Senator and  Congresspersons who support federal jobs, who support the middle class, to which we belong, and who believe in the basic right to organize for better wages and working conditions.

The time will come, most likely within the next 4 years, that the fate of the Postal Service will be decided.

Do you want John McCain, Norm Coleman and Michelle Bachman and John Kline, who favor privatization of federal jobs; or Barack Obama, Al Franken, 1st District Tim Waltz; 2nd District Steve Sarvi; 3rd District Ashwin Madia; 4th District Betty McCollum; 5th District Keith Ellingson; 6th District  El Tinklenberg; 7th District Collin Peterson; and 8th District Jim Oberstar who believe in and will fight for public service jobs?

Bluntly put, as postal employees, you have been secure enough in your employment to vote for candidates based on a variety of issues not related to your job.  Those days have reached an end.  This election is about your job.

 _____________________________________________

COLA Increase - $1,477 – Will Be Highest in History

 

          Thanks to a cost-of-living adjustment that will be the highest in APWU bargaining history, postal workers represented by the union will be receiving an annual raise of $1,477 at the end of the month.

            The increase is the result of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rise during the six months of the most recent Cost-of-Living measuring period under the 2006-2010 Collective Bargaining Agreement.

            “This is not only the largest COLA increase under the current contract,”  said President William Burrus, “but the largest  such raise we’ve ever achieved.”

            The COLA will be effective August 30, and will be reflected in September 19 paychecks.  The adjustment will amount to a 71-cent per hour increase, or $56.80 per pay period. 

            The CPI for July, the last month in the measuring period, was released August 14, and represents the completion of the fourth six-month COLA period in the 2006 National Agreement.

            “Cost-of-living adjustments make important contributions to our members’ wages,” Burrus said.  “APWU members who began in 2008 at Level 5 Step O will realize an increase of nearly $3,200 per year as a result of the February upgrade and the March and August COLAs.”

            There will be four more COLA adjustments under the latest contract.  Employees received a $686 raise on September 1, 2007 and a $479 raise on March 15.

            With the latest adjustment, the COLA increases in the current contract will total $2,642.

 

 

FLAT MAIL VOLUME DROPS MANAGEMENT ELIMINATION UFSM 1000 MACHINE -from the September Postmark

            by Pat McCann, President

            The union was notified in a letter dated August 8, 2008 that they would be “restructuring” the UFSM 1000 operation by taking out of service one (1) UFSM 1000 machine.  The impact to the Clerk Craft would be on Tour 1 and Tour 3.  There was no reported impact to the Maintenance Craft.

            At the meeting with management, they basically showed us the volume drop in Flats since the rate increase (shape based pricing) and the corresponding throughput numbers supporting their decision to eliminate one machine.

            Management is in the process of putting together a staffing package for Tour 1 and Tour 3 for the remaining machine.

            Once they have that completed, they have agreed to meet with the affected units.  A union representative will be present at the meetings to answer questions from the members concerning their contractual rights.

 

 

 

UPDATE ON MOVE TO EAGAN - from the May 2008 Postmark

          By Pat McCann, President

          Approximately three (3) weeks ago, the Postal Board of Governors met and approved the sale of the concourse and parking lot to the Ramsey County Rail Authority.  The Post Office building itself was not part of the deal.

          Apparently Ramsey County has funds already allocated for this purchase and are working out the details of the purchase with the USPS.  I don’t have any information at this time as to when the final agreement will be signed.  The union has begun to make inquiries as to the affect this will have on employee parking after the purchase is completed.

          As for the future site in Eagan, the parties (USPS, Dakota County, City of Eagan) still have not come to an agreement on where vehicles will access and egress to the facility and who will pay for it.                                                                                                                                                                              As you can see, the project is still moving along at a snail’s pace and it does not appear that it is going to pick up speed anytime soon.

 

 

The Function 4 Merry Go Round Continues -from the April 2008 Postmark

 

          Over the past several months the union has met on Function 4 staffing packages for some of the stations and branches (Eagan, Industrial, Apple Valley, Main Office, and Woodbury).

          After several meetings in appears management’s directions is to start reposting positions where there is heavy overtime usage on Mondays.  Apparently, management believes by reposting some positions to 5 week rotations, they will be able to significantly reduce Monday overtime.  Does this sound like the same old song and dance routine we heard 3 years ago from then Postmaster Cindy Larson right before she proceeded to repost almost the entire city from 10 week rotation to 6 week rotation?  The reason she gave for reposing positions was too much overtime on Saturdays.  The union explained to Postmaster Cindy Larson that unless management staffed the station with the proper number of clerks to cover days off, annual leave (10%-14% depending on time of year) and sick leave usage, reposting positions would just chase the overtime to another day, and guess what?  The other day is now Monday.         

          The sad part about what happened 3 years ago besides the fact that it disrupted the lives of our members, is that management appears not to have learned a single thing from it and is on the verge of repeating it again.  It took almost 2 ½ years for things to begin to settle down from the last repostings.  As an example, almost the entire work force at the Apple Valley post office bid out of the office after the reposting. The result was a staffing crisis that caused numerous contract violations and financially cost the Post Office thousands of dollars.

          I have been meeting periodically with Postmaster Mike Larson, not on any particular office, but in general on the function four process in an attempt to avoid repeating the disaster that occurred 2 ½ years ago.

          We continue to have constructive discussions on this issue and no repostings have occurred yet.

          Vice-President Dawn Ecker has been meeting with each individual station manager to go over the 1994’s. To date none of the function 4’s have been finalized.  Once we have completed the meetings on the 1994’s and have a finalized package, we will share the information with the members via station visits or a bulletin.

 

 

 

FMLA Under Attack – reprinted from the March 2008 Postmark

 

          President Bush’s appointed henchmen at the Department of Labor are at it again.  They are proposing changes to the Family Medical Leave Act that if implemented, will most certainly negatively affect the very workers that the Act was supposed to protect. 

          Of course it is not surprising the employers are at the forefront in pushing the DOL to modify provisions of the Law to tilt the landscape in their favor.

          The Law was enacted during the Clinton administration and for more than a decade has made a positive impact on millions of workers and thousands of postal workers and their families.

          Some of the changes being proposed that would affect postal workers:

·  Current regulations prohibit employers from making direct contact with an employee’s physician. The proposed rules would create exceptions to this prohibition.

·  Eligible employees would be required to re-certify lifelong or chronic conditions at least twice a year, regardless of the length of the certification issued by a healthcare provider. (Employees would have to bear the costs of the additional trips to the doctor.) Under current regulations, such certifications last up to a year.

·  Current regulation prohibit the disclosure of a “diagnosis or prognosis” on any form. The proposed rule would allow employers to request but not require disclosure.

·  While the proposed regulations would allow eligible employees to seek damages against employers who fail to provide them proper notice of their rights under the FMLA, the burden of proof in such cases would be quite high and employees would have to show actual damages suffered.

·  Current regulations stipulate that a health problem can qualify as a serious condition when an absence is followed by two visits with a healthcare provider. The proposed regulations would restrict FMLA eligibility by requiring that follow-up treatment take place within 30 days of the start of a medical absence.

·  Current law requires employers to provide notice to employees within two business days. The proposed rule expands the period to five business days.

Right now as it stands, FMLA is a fairly easy benefit for workers to access.  It doesn’t require a huge amount of hurdles to get coverage but enough to discourage individuals from continually abusing the system.  Yes, I know there are individuals who are and will continue to abuse FMLA, but there enough regulations in the current law if the employers chose to enforce it, that would clean up the abuses.

 

          Instead, it appears that employers are pushing the DOL to make FMLA a more cumbersome benefit to access by implementing less worker-friendly regulations requiring more doctor visits, more paperwork and so on.

 

          One does not need to look far to see where this is headed if the regulations are changed.

          When DOL, Office of Worker Compensation Program first come into existence, it was a fairly worker friendly benefit to access.  If you got injured at work and had to miss work because of the injury or required medical treatment, you filled out a couple of forms and got paid for the missed work hours and your medical bills were paid by the employer without too much hassle.  Not anymore, once employers began to pressure the DOL for more regulations in regard to the OWCP, the benefit became a paperwork nightmare with endless doctor’s visits, unpaid medical bills and so on.  In the end, employees for the most part have given up in regards to getting compensated for work injuries, in the most part because of the massive paperwork involved and continued harassment by the employer to get coverage.  In the end, the employers got what they wanted, a benefit so entangled in regulations that it paralyzed employee’s ability to access it.

          This is exactly what they (employers) are up to with the changes they have proposed for FMLA and this is just the start.

          Before these changes can be implemented, the DOL is required to take public comments on the proposed changes.  The APWU plans to file objections during the 60 day comment period.

 

 

 

          Once again, the St. Paul, MN Area Local has risen to the challenge facing us in the area of political action.  In 2007, members of the local contributed a total of $10,902.48 to the Committee on Political Action (COPA). This is an increase over 2006 donations in the amount of $537.98.

          In 2007 we increased those who contribute bi-weekly from 65 to 76.   The committee had set a goal of reaching 76 and we reached it.

          The above would not have been achieved without you, the members, recognizing the importance of contributing to a political action fund.

          COPA provides President Burrus the opportunity to access members of Congress from both sides of the aisle that make decisions on legislation put forth affecting our working environment as postal workers.  It also helps when the APWU wants legislation introduced such as Bill (HR 4236) which would affect private contracts involving mail processing, mail handling, or surface transportation of mail if signed into law; as it would require the USPS to bargain with the affected unions before awarding such contracts.

          In 2008 we will be again faced with further attempts by the USPS to consolidate and/or close post offices.  This, along with, the always present attempts to privatize the USPS are why the APWU needs to stay active in the political arena.  The APWU has been able to thwart a number of consolidations of processing centers around the country by enlisting congressional support for our position. On a broader scale, the labor movement is constantly under attack by the corporations attempting to introduce legislation to erode unions’ ability to bargain on behalf of their members.

          The APWU has been able to thwart a number of consolidations of processing centers around the country by enlisting congressional support for our position. 

          This can only be accomplished by being involved in politics on Capitol Hill.  Involvement is made possible through our Committee on Political Action (COPA).

          I would like to thank those who contributed to COPA in 2007. I have listed your names on page _________.  I would also like to thank Bruce Gutzke, our COPA Coordinator for his tireless work.  Great job Bruce!

          Lastly, I hope that those who supported COPA in 2007 will continue to do so in 2008, and for those who missed your opportunity to contribute in 2007, I challenge you to contribute to COPA in 2008 so that we continue to have a healthy political action fund so that our voices are collectively heard on Capitol Hill.

 

Pat McCann

President